|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-08-2016, 07:56 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 8
|
!933 Four Cylinder
I have read some where that '33 4 bangers had a wheel base of a 106 inches, can any one of you knowledgeable people on here confirm this ? Cheers.
|
10-08-2016, 08:14 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,460
|
Re: !933 Four Cylinder
Hi; WB same just different drive shaft [tube] lengths V8 vs 4 newc
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
10-08-2016, 09:08 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,713
|
Re: !933 Four Cylinder
4 and V8 were 112" wheel base.
Bob |
10-08-2016, 10:58 PM | #4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 8
|
Re: !933 Four Cylinder
Thanks guys, I couldn't see how this was possible but I thought I would check here just to be sure. Cheers
|
10-08-2016, 11:57 PM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 8
|
Re: !933 Four Cylinder
Just found where I read it , it was in a Max Catalogue.
|
10-09-2016, 02:50 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: adelaide australia
Posts: 163
|
Re: !933 Four Cylinder
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
112" for the 33 up to 40 cars, 41 pickups. not sure about 41 cars but thought they were 115 or 116". |
10-09-2016, 09:22 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: !933 Four Cylinder
That sort of silly error should cause us to read all of the listings in their catalogs with a grain of salt.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|