|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,486
|
![]()
I need your help again. It seems I have a lot of questions these days. Actually, I am working on presentations for my local club, so questions arise I never thought of before.
At this time I am building a presentation about engine vibrations which leads to this question. What is the weight of one crankshaft counterbalance weight before it goes onto a crankshaft?
__________________
Bob Bidonde |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,159
|
![]()
which style of counterweight ---i have some of the ford design shrink on ones i could weigh
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,486
|
![]()
Thanks Kurt. Please weigh one for me.
__________________
Bob Bidonde |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,095
|
![]()
Early '28, so-called 'beaver-tail' cranks weigh 27 lbs.
Later A's weigh 29 lbs. B cranks, 39 lbs. C cranks, 46 lbs. BB cranks, 58 lbs. (pressed-on, 1" wide weights. So called because these were added by authorized Ford rebuilders when a 'B' engine was rebuilt, mostly on 'B' trucks. I may have some weights I planned on putting on a 'B' crank, I'll look for them. A & B engines have naturally occuring vibration points, at about 800-900, 1600, and 2300 (this from my menory) They are heard more than felt, in most engines they aren't noticeable, and usually when being driven, not sitting in your driveway. Last edited by Jim Brierley; 08-23-2020 at 11:54 AM. Reason: Added info |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: 34.22 N 118.36 W
Posts: 1,059
|
![]()
Interesting inquiry, I found old picture of B-B counterweight drawing some years ago.
I then modeled up in solidworks, from a pretty bad sketch. I come up with mass of #4.87 per counterweight. As an interesting side note, the Miller racing engines found that you could not get enough counter weight to balance out the harmonics. If you look at pics of them, the counterweight is full radius and 180 degrees opposite the rod journal. John
__________________
As Carroll Smith wrote; All Failures are Human in Origin. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Van, Texas
Posts: 1,122
|
![]() Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
also. crankshft turned 10/10 under weighs in at 24.8 with no counterweights. Second crankshaft also turned 10/10 under with the above weights added weighs in at 37 lbs. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Birch Bay WA
Posts: 190
|
![]()
What exactly are the counterbalance weights for. What effect would it have on my engine if it was not counter balanced.
Gerry Birch Bay WA. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Saint Cloud Mn
Posts: 745
|
![]()
Is it possible to “turn” a crankshaft as opposed to grinding.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,417
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,509
|
![]()
From what I have heard, what ever you do to put counterweights on an A crank, you won't have the optimum. Right now, I don't remember the name of the guy who attaches shrink on weights to the crank, then puts more weight on the side of those. I think that setup would be heavier than the others and closer to ideal.
Clearly, shrink on weights will weigh more than the weld on ones because they go all the way around the crank flange without adding any more counterweight effect. I don't think we have enough information to properly answer this question.
__________________
I'm part of the only ever generation with an analogue childhood and a digital adulthood. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,417
|
![]() Quote:
It would do well in parades. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,509
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
I'm part of the only ever generation with an analogue childhood and a digital adulthood. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,417
|
![]() Quote:
A heavy total weight, crank assembly limits the performance of any car not only by total weight added to the car but MOSTLY because of poor spool up. This is usualy of little concern in a vintage street machine though. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,486
|
![]()
Thanks Ken Parker. This is exactly what I asked for:
I have s set of counterweights from Berts. Bolt on then weld the ends. Set of 4. Each one weighs 3.1 lbs total weight of 12.4 lbs. They are the samee thickness as the counters on the crankshft - 5/8" thick. Also crankshft turned 10/10 under weighs in at 24.8 with no counterweights. Second crankshaft also turned 10/10 under with the above weights added weighs in at 37 lbs.
__________________
Bob Bidonde |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 5,048
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
If you don't hear a rumor by 10 AM, start one!. Got my education out behind the barn! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,095
|
![]()
Gerry Allen, counterweights increase the life of the crank & bearings. You will feel little or no increase in smoothness while driving.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wa.
Posts: 5,417
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Saint Cloud Mn
Posts: 745
|
![]()
What kind of lathe would you need to “Turn” crankshaft journals. How accurate finish can be obtained. Does anyone have more info and pictures?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Eastern Tennessee
Posts: 11,534
|
![]() Quote:
I have a Storm Vulcan 15 crankshaft grinder, -and my biggest lathe is a Howa 16" x 59". Both machines weigh around 4,500 pounds, yet the crank grinder is a much more rigid machine comparing the two. When trying to achieve a quality finish, rigidity is a must. So my point is you would need a very robust lathe to achieve a finish you could be happy with. Using a tool-post grinder on that lathe would be a plus. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 515
|
![]()
Would this one be rigid enough? It is a 42 inch throw facing and boring lathe weighing 10.5 tons without the face plate shown. There is no tail stock on this type but another face plate or a precision steady can be mounted on the rear.
My son and I are just fettling and setting it up in our collection. I am just joking because I have no intention of machining a crankshaft in it. I have trued up several Model A rear flanges in another of our lathes, after straightening the cranks in a press. A crank grinder is something missing in our collection of machine tools. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|