|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-04-2017, 07:21 PM | #61 |
Senior Member
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
I fitted a new clutch and PP( Imported ) after running it a while it developed some chatter ,I have Borg and beck setting jig so I set it up and found the fingers were not even ,I suspect the re popped clutches don't use hardened pins in the arms so something had worn .the clutch smoothed out on replacing it so having the finger s even is important ,just a few thou. In the light of that on a old ford clutch if the thrust bearing and it mechanism does not release the three fingers evenly then that may be a contributing factor, Ted
|
04-04-2017, 07:47 PM | #62 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 5,762
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
Quote:
Fortunately, clutch chatter doesn't interfere with me driving my flathead over ten-thousand miles a year and most likely never will.
__________________
Prof. Henry (The Roaming Gnome) "It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end.” *Ursula K. Le Guin in The Left Hand of Darkness Last edited by Old Henry; 04-04-2017 at 08:01 PM. |
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
04-04-2017, 07:50 PM | #63 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: san antonio, texas
Posts: 461
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
|
04-04-2017, 07:55 PM | #64 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 5,762
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
Quote:
__________________
Prof. Henry (The Roaming Gnome) "It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end.” *Ursula K. Le Guin in The Left Hand of Darkness Last edited by Old Henry; 04-04-2017 at 11:32 PM. |
|
04-04-2017, 09:23 PM | #65 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,438
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
Quote:
__________________
'52 F-1, EAB flathead |
|
04-04-2017, 09:48 PM | #66 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 5,762
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
The flywheel was surfaced by the local racing machine shop, the same one that balanced every moving part in my engine that makes it run so smooth now. It doesn't look quite as bad in this light as the first picture on this post. It certainly was never as rough as the first picture looks and is smoother now than when first surfaced 38,000 miles ago. As far as I know, that was only the second time it had been surfaced. (The very slight wear shown is from the very brief driving of the car after the engine was first rebuilt but not balanced and had a bad vibration and had to be removed, dismantled, and balanced.)
__________________
Prof. Henry (The Roaming Gnome) "It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end.” *Ursula K. Le Guin in The Left Hand of Darkness Last edited by Old Henry; 04-04-2017 at 10:13 PM. |
04-04-2017, 10:45 PM | #67 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: sw minnesota
Posts: 4,574
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
long thread here! no one has pointed out the obvious here, the center plate holding the springs has wear too. certainly thats gonna have some effect, chatter-noise-somthing was going on near the end. 38000 miles, and always chatter? from day one? anti chatter rods tight to the frame? they are a bugger when the threads are bad or if you dont have the right size tool to tighten them. its a bastard size, not a 3/8 square, and bigger than a quarter. i made a tool on the mill and it lasted one bolt and was junk-too soft. next one i had to weld the head to the frame to get the nut off, then grind of the weld to get the bolt out. now, i order grade 8 allen heads from fastenal. so, are your bolts tight? next, flywheel surface. i have used flywheels that sat out side for decades and cleaned them up with 80 grit on a sander. never had a problem, unless it was obvious once the surface was clean. next is the issue of the disk center hitting the bolts. its from ft wayne, we'd all like to say its good, but if you still have another disk laying around, i'd like to know the distance from the hub to the spring cage that was hitting the flywheel. it could be a bad part. not ruled out yet. i'd take a grinder to the bolts if the distance is correct. next, clutch chatter can also come from other worn out parts. u joint would be obvious, you are there now, worn spline? bad front drive shaft bearing or thrust washer?, sheared pin on the rear coupler? also, as mentioned, it would be easy to check the runout of the flywheel, on the car. many crank grinders do not face that off unless you ask them to check it. i am not the expert here just maybe brought up some other points. i know you do lots of miles, bless you for that, i drive the heck out of my cars too. love your travel photos, and hows the new dog doing without a car to ride in? best wishes, skip
|
04-04-2017, 11:52 PM | #68 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 5,762
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
No anti-chatter rods on a '47.
Dog has wife's RAV4 to ride in that she likes even better.
__________________
Prof. Henry (The Roaming Gnome) "It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end.” *Ursula K. Le Guin in The Left Hand of Darkness |
04-05-2017, 12:21 AM | #69 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
The surface doesn´t look bad just so that it runs true, if it´s a machineshop building race engines they should know how to surface a flywheel.
I would look at the condition of the engine and gearbox mounts if they are soft or not tight you get shatter to. |
04-05-2017, 08:47 AM | #70 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada Where it snows
Posts: 2,058
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
|
04-05-2017, 09:36 AM | #71 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,431
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
If the shop doing the flywheel doesn't have a rig like this then you have to be aware. Watch the video of the machine in action. You can see how bad a flywheel can get.
http://www.winonavannorman.com/produ...g5000_flywheel |
04-05-2017, 09:49 AM | #72 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: sw minnesota
Posts: 4,574
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
well heck no wonder if you dont have chatter rods!, just kidding, i thought they went up to the shoebox. when is the end of the rods? thanks for the education i always get here!!
|
04-05-2017, 10:42 AM | #73 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
You can cut a flywheel on a lathe...if...there is no hardspots...or...you cut thrue them.
Only time a flywheel meets a lathe here is when they are on a diet...loosing half there weight. |
04-05-2017, 10:58 AM | #74 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,431
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
A lathe will certainly true them up but a grinder leaves a more conducive friction surface. Sort of like the cross hatch on a cylinder wall makes for better piston ring bedding in.
|
04-05-2017, 11:39 AM | #75 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pa.
Posts: 2,171
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
The Flywheel grinding machine shown in the video looks a lot like a miniature version of machine I had to learn to run as a Tool and Die Apprentice called a Blanchard Grinder
Quote:
__________________
Nomad |
|
04-05-2017, 12:15 PM | #76 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 16,431
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
Blanchard grinders can get a way lot bigger than a flywheel grinder but they both work on a very similar principle.
|
04-05-2017, 12:51 PM | #77 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,045
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
Every new flywheel is just cut...the real reason you grind used flywheels are to deal with the hardspots.
|
04-05-2017, 12:55 PM | #78 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,113
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
Quote:
http://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showth...=152238&page=2 .......which states: "Pressure plate and clutch were all replaced with new from Fort Wayne Clutch. It, along with the trueness of the crank just put in (it with the flywheel had less than 1/1000th run out whereas the previous crank was 2/1000ths) totally solved my clutch chatter problem I've suffered with for a year and a half. That was sure nice. I sure hope any redoing of the engine doesn't undo that nicety." I'm having a hard time understanding YOUR recollection of the clutch chatter. Back then you said the new clutch "totally solved my clutch chatter problem". Now, you state that this Ft. Wayne Clutch was bad from the start, 38K miles ago. Which is it? DD |
|
04-05-2017, 02:24 PM | #79 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada Where it snows
Posts: 2,058
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
Someone here must have a measurement for the depth,from flywheel clutch surface
to the flange surface that the bolts head seat on.That will determine what was removed from previous machine shops. The flywheel resurface was done on a grinder as the pattern is viable and not on a lathe. Run out must be taken to confirm it as square to the mounting surface. R |
04-05-2017, 03:04 PM | #80 |
Senior Member
|
Re: What's wrong with this picture?
Heres the Borge setting jig it uses a 7mm spacer in three places to simulate the plate/disk, I think you could do the same with a venire on your fly wheel .the first pic is a diaphragm clutch that could be substituted for a ford one ,not sure of the brand .Ted
Last edited by FlatheadTed; 04-05-2017 at 08:52 PM. |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|