Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-26-2022, 02:25 PM   #1
coup34
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 316
Default 1930 common rear axle ratio

like to know the most common rear axle ratio.
THANKS
coup34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2022, 02:33 PM   #2
Vic in E-TN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Maryville, TN
Posts: 491
Default Re: 1930 common rear axle ratio

3.78 is the most common. Others - 4.11 and 3.54 were available from dealers usually. Sometimes you could get parted out rear ends with these.



Vic
Vic in E-TN is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 10-26-2022, 02:47 PM   #3
coup34
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 316
Default Re: 1930 common rear axle ratio

Thanks
coup34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2022, 07:43 PM   #4
Terry, NJ
Senior Member
 
Terry, NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bucks Co, Pa
Posts: 3,740
Default Re: 1930 common rear axle ratio

I believe 3.78 is the most common. However, with today's road conditions, cost of gas, etc I would have no problem with 3.54 in it. If your engine is really strong or you live in flatlands, I would recommend the 3.25/27. I put 3.54s in my two coupes and i can't imagine what Henry was thinking of when he used the 3.78s. But it can be expensive (About $700 ) and a lot of work. Good Luck!
Terry
Terry, NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2022, 08:07 PM   #5
Synchro909
Senior Member
 
Synchro909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,496
Default Re: 1930 common rear axle ratio

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry, NJ View Post
I believe 3.78 is the most common. However, with today's road conditions, cost of gas, etc I would have no problem with 3.54 in it. If your engine is really strong or you live in flatlands, I would recommend the 3.25/27. I put 3.54s in my two coupes and i can't imagine what Henry was thinking of when he used the 3.78s. But it can be expensive (About $700 ) and a lot of work. Good Luck!
Terry
I think these days, many of us forget that in Model A days, cars shared the road with horses and the speed limit on the best highways was 40mph.
__________________
I'm part of the only ever generation with an analogue childhood and a digital adulthood.
Synchro909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2022, 08:30 PM   #6
Big hammer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Land of Lincoln
Posts: 3,131
Default Re: 1930 common rear axle ratio

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Synchro909 View Post
I think these days, many of us forget that in Model A days, cars shared the road with horses and the speed limit on the best highways was 40mph.
Yep muddy roads deep snow and the hills where steeper, they spent a lot of time in second gear
__________________
Don't force it with a little hammer tap, tap, tap
get a bigger hammer tap done
Big hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2022, 08:22 AM   #7
nkaminar
Senior Member
 
nkaminar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 3,900
Default Re: 1930 common rear axle ratio

3.78 with an overdrive and high compression head (6.0:1) = 20 mpg.
__________________
A is for apple, green as the sky.
Step on the gas, for tomorrow I die.
Forget the brakes, they really don't work.
The clutch always sticks, and starts with a jerk.
My car grows red hair, and flies through the air.
Driving's a blast, a blast from the past.
nkaminar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2022, 08:41 AM   #8
Bob Bidonde
Senior Member
 
Bob Bidonde's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,472
Default Re: 1930 common rear axle ratio

This is a list of all I could find:
__________________
Bob Bidonde
Bob Bidonde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2022, 10:01 AM   #9
BRENT in 10-uh-C
Senior Member
 
BRENT in 10-uh-C's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Eastern Tennessee
Posts: 11,520
Default Re: 1930 common rear axle ratio

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic in E-TN View Post
3.78 is the most common. Others - 4.11 and 3.54 were available from dealers usually. Sometimes you could get parted out rear ends with these.
Hey Vic, I hear that you are out of the hospital now and hopefully you are feeling better.

Not sure if you are suggesting the 3.54 ratio was available from the Ford Agency (dealership) or a reproduction parts dealer, but I have heard this stated many times that Ford offered the 3.54 back in the day. I am curious if you, -or anyone has any proof of this. The reason I ask is I have researched it at the archives and know there was a pre-production experimental gear set that was a 3.54 however it was superseded in production by the 3.70. Outside of that, I have never seen any print or literature that has shown the 3.54 ratio for a Model-A. Does anyone have anything to confirm it was indeed available back then??


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Bidonde View Post
This is a list of all I could find:
Bob, to muddy up the waters and add another ratio or two to the mix, in early 1932 all V8 powered vehicles came standard with a 4.33 gear ratio (-which interchanges with the Model-A R&P). Then, there is a 4.56 gear ratio that was offered in the AF models along with a 4.88 gear set that was manufactured by Power King to use in their Economy Tractors that used cut down Model-A rear axle assemblies.
__________________
.

BRENT in 10-uh-C
.
www.model-a-ford.com
...(...Finally Updated!! )

.
BRENT in 10-uh-C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2022, 11:16 AM   #10
fundytides
Senior Member
 
fundytides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 480
Default Re: 1930 common rear axle ratio

In my Ford (Canada) parts catalog, dated 1938, only the 3:78 and 4:111 matched sets are listed as available for 1928-32 A, B and 18. The only 3:54 - high speed- set is listed for 1935-36 Model 48, 50. 67 and 68.
fundytides is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2022, 11:48 AM   #11
Tom Endy
Senior Member
 
Tom Endy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,131
Default Re: 1930 common rear axle ratio

During Model A production three ring & pinion ratios were used. The early 28's used a 370 ratio. The majority of cars used a 378 ratio. Pick-up trucks, station wagons, and some town sedans used a 411 ratio. The 354 ratio was introduced as an after market some years later when the country's roads improved.

Here is a list of the ratios available today:
370 - 37\10
411 - 37\9
378 - 34\9
354 - 39\11
327 - 36\11
433 - 39\9 (1932)
Divide the smaller number into the larger for the ratio. The numbers are the tooth count on the gears.

The attached article describes the the early ring & pinion.

http://www.santaanitaas.org/wp-conte...ing-Pinion.pdf

Tom Endy
Tom Endy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2022, 11:54 AM   #12
jeepguy1948
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 722
Default Re: 1930 common rear axle ratio

Just in case you are considering swapping to a 3:54 gear you should know that a Model A motor (Even modified) won’t pull a 3:54 and an overdrive and you lose “parade gear” first
jeepguy1948 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2022, 08:17 PM   #13
Terry, NJ
Senior Member
 
Terry, NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bucks Co, Pa
Posts: 3,740
Default Re: 1930 common rear axle ratio

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeepguy1948 View Post
Just in case you are considering swapping to a 3:54 gear you should know that a Model A motor (Even modified) won’t pull a 3:54 and an overdrive and you lose “parade gear” first
I am impressed at how good the 3.54 reargears pull the hills around here. I live in Rock Hill townsp, Bucks co, Pa. They don't call it "Rock Hill" for nothing. Many of the smaller roads going up and down have switchbacks. Portions of some of the roads are just too steep to go straight up or down. I've never had the head off the engine, but I suspect it's a Snyder 5.2. The engine also has a "B" carb. with a bored out manifold. I was so convinced of the superiority of this rear and engine set up, i'm making another one.
Terry
Terry, NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 PM.