Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-12-2015, 10:45 AM   #61
Jack E/NJ
Senior Member
 
Jack E/NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,173
Default Re: Another myth put out to pasture

itslow>>>Imagine how much floor space would be consumed if the cranks were stored horizontally.>>>

OK, I imagine they wouldn't take up that much space if horizontally nested or just piled in a mountain of cranks in a corner somewhere. Carefully of course. And also no higher than the yield point of the cranks at the very bottom of the pile. 8^)

Jack E/NJ
Jack E/NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 11:34 AM   #62
Mart
Senior Member
 
Mart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Solihull, England.
Posts: 8,743
Default Re: Another myth put out to pasture

Ford wouldn't have had the cranks around for very long. They would have been into cars and out the door in very little time. I'm terrible for storage, I just let 'em lie on the shelf.

Mart.
Mart is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 11-12-2015, 01:25 PM   #63
CT AV8
Senior Member
 
CT AV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cos Cob, CT
Posts: 295
Default Re: Another myth put out to pasture

Quote:
Originally Posted by alchemy View Post
If the myth that an unsupported cast iron crank will bend due to prolonged exposure to gravity is true, do you really think some lightweight wood will keep the cast iron from bending? Wood's density is WAY less than cast iron, and even cast iron can't hold up to gravity. The wood will probably be pulverized.







.
Yes, I do. Density and compressive strength are different things. A flathead crank weighs 70 lbs. The main beating journals are 2.5" diameter and although I don't have one to measure, are about 1.5" wide for front and center with the larger rear around 2". This gives me a collective bearing area of 12.5 sq in. Divide 12.5 by 70#= 5.6 psi. Douglas fir has a compressive strength 7,239 psi parallel to the grain. It's not even close to being " pulverized".
CT AV8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 01:34 PM   #64
CT AV8
Senior Member
 
CT AV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cos Cob, CT
Posts: 295
Default Re: Another myth put out to pasture

Quote:
Originally Posted by GB SISSON View Post
One of my flathead rebuild books has a diagram showing a plank with 3 blocks of wood attached to a perhaps 1" plank. The 3 blocks are cut into a 'vee' shape at each journal. Not being any kind of metalurgist or real mechanic, but a career woodworker, I thought nobody could build that accurately enough to make it support evenly. Even if it was originally built by a professional woodworker with extreme precision on jigs and fixtures, the blocks would shrink and swell at different rates and with the 'vee' design, shrinkage or swelling would raise or lower the support on the journal at the whim of the atmospheric conditions. Three steel tabs welded to an I beam might work if you ground the center one and used a feeler gauge when checking the center one but....zzzzzzzzzzzzz why?
GB, I've seen those "V" cradles as well. I was thinking more in the shape of a bearing retainer. Drill 2.5" hole in wood and cut in half. The idea is to support the crank as it was originally designed to be. I guess deflection is caused by setting a crank on the counterweights placing too much load on the journals. Once you've gotten rid of the weird cantilevering effects, you wouldn't have to worry about minor swelling and shrinkage of the support. If you do, you can always use a PSL vs Doug fir.
CT AV8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 02:35 PM   #65
Mike B
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oakdale,Ca
Posts: 1,323
Default Re: Another myth put out to pasture

Do a Google Search for "locomotive crankshaft storage", the click on Google Images, first one I saw was of about 5 Locomotive cranks stored horizontally, and only supported on/near the ends.
Mike B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 02:47 PM   #66
cmbrucew
Senior Member
 
cmbrucew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North of sandy ago, CA.
Posts: 2,064
Default Re: Another myth put out to pasture

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike B View Post
Do a Google Search for "locomotive crankshaft storage", the click on Google Images, first one I saw was of about 5 Locomotive cranks stored horizontally, and only supported on/near the ends.
Locomotive crankshaft and camshafts can be 2 or 3 pieces bolted together.
Bruce
__________________
Works good
Lasts long time
cmbrucew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 05:25 PM   #67
itslow
Senior Member
 
itslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 690
Default Re: Another myth put out to pasture

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike B View Post
Do a Google Search for "locomotive crankshaft storage", the click on Google Images, first one I saw was of about 5 Locomotive cranks stored horizontally, and only supported on/near the ends.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmbrucew View Post
Locomotive crankshaft and camshafts can be 2 or 3 pieces bolted together.
Point being?





How about one from a ship?



Sizes are increased compared to an automobile, but the concept and principles are the same.
__________________
Mike

Wanted:
- '32-34 Open Cab Pickup (RPU) parts and documents/articles/info
- ARDUN parts
itslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 07:04 PM   #68
Mike B
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oakdale,Ca
Posts: 1,323
Default Re: Another myth put out to pasture

My point is they don't seem to be concerned with the crank deflection
Mike B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 07:39 PM   #69
Jack E/NJ
Senior Member
 
Jack E/NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,173
Default Re: Another myth put out to pasture

>>>itslow>>>

Bet my crank is bigger than your's. Looks like each big end in this photo gets it's own oil puddle.

Jack E/NJ
Attached Images
File Type: jpg bigcrank.jpg (49.0 KB, 83 views)
Jack E/NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 10:56 PM   #70
47COE
Senior Member
 
47COE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 220
Default Re: Another myth put out to pasture

I saw that ship engine crankshaft too. The crankshaft weighs 300 tons. 38 bore x 98 inch stroke. 7790 HP for each of the 14 cylinders. I'd like to see the machine that grinds that crank.
47COE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2016, 09:59 AM   #71
itslow
Senior Member
 
itslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 690
Default Re: Another myth put out to pasture

Please refer to the thread "Gravity bends a crank?":

https://fordbarn.com/forum/showpost.p...&postcount=141
__________________
Mike

Wanted:
- '32-34 Open Cab Pickup (RPU) parts and documents/articles/info
- ARDUN parts
itslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2016, 11:49 AM   #72
tiger.1000
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hertford (UK)
Posts: 905
Default Re: Another myth put out to pasture

EUREKA ! next time they send a space shuttle up, pack in a bunch of crankshafts! If a man can float in air, so can a crankshaft.....can't it ?

BUT.....
tiger.1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2016, 02:27 PM   #73
flatheadernie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 229
Default Re: Another myth put out to pasture

What you need to do is keep all the warped ones is case of VAPOR LOCK LOL
flatheadernie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2016, 03:58 PM   #74
robert dick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 317
Default Re: Another myth put out to pasture

how do we know the shafts didn't have any runout when stored ?
robert dick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 AM.