Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-14-2023, 04:07 PM   #1
drolston
Senior Member
 
drolston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 1,627
Default Rear Cam Bearing Interference with Fuel Pump Pushrod

The rear cam bearing got installed back too far; about 1/16" into the hole where the fuel pump push rod drops onto the fuel pump lobe on the cam. Push rod is blocked. Engine is in the car working on an electric fuel pump, but I would like to have it go through the mechanical pump for redundancy.
Suggestions?
Any way to cut out the interfering material without putting shavings into the oil?
Turn down the fuel pump push rod end enough to pass by?
??
drolston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2023, 04:41 PM   #2
Ronnieroadster
Senior Member
 
Ronnieroadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Coast in CT
Posts: 1,529
Default Re: Rear Cam Bearing Interference with Fuel Pump Pushrod

There's no way to open up the area of the cam bearing that's now in the way without putting metal in the oil.

The only option you have is to reduce the diameter of the push rod so it fits into the now smaller opening. BUT each end of the fuel pump push rod if original is rather hard material and each end is pressed into a tube. If the lower area of the push rod can be reduced without touching the tube material it should work at least for a while.
Keep in mind the push rod hole is in the main oil passage especially on early to 1948 blocks. If the push rod is removed the push rod hole needs to be pluged at the top so there's not a big oil leak in the engine.
On 1949 and latter block's the push rod bushing has a small oil hole in the center of the bushing so the oil leak in the main passage would not be as great as the earlier blocks. However the push rod hole still needs to be pluged if the push rod is removed.
Ronnieroadster
__________________
I use the F word a lot no not that word these words Flathead , Focus and Finish.
"Life Member of the Bonneville 200 MPH Club using a Ford Flathead block"
Owner , Builder, Driver of the First Ford Flathead bodied roadster to run 200 MPH Record July 13, 2018 LTA timing association 200.921 in one and a half miles burning gasoline.
First ever gas burning Ford flathead powered roadster to run 200 MPH at Bonneville Salt Flats setting the record August 7th 2021 at 205.744 MPH
Ronnieroadster is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 06-14-2023, 06:12 PM   #3
Ken/Alabama
Senior Member
 
Ken/Alabama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 3,261
Default Re: Rear Cam Bearing Interference with Fuel Pump Pushrod

Been running my 59A for 30 years without a pushrod. Never had an oil pressure issue.
Ken/Alabama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2023, 08:08 PM   #4
Ronnieroadster
Senior Member
 
Ronnieroadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: East Coast in CT
Posts: 1,529
Default Re: Rear Cam Bearing Interference with Fuel Pump Pushrod

Nice
__________________
I use the F word a lot no not that word these words Flathead , Focus and Finish.
"Life Member of the Bonneville 200 MPH Club using a Ford Flathead block"
Owner , Builder, Driver of the First Ford Flathead bodied roadster to run 200 MPH Record July 13, 2018 LTA timing association 200.921 in one and a half miles burning gasoline.
First ever gas burning Ford flathead powered roadster to run 200 MPH at Bonneville Salt Flats setting the record August 7th 2021 at 205.744 MPH
Ronnieroadster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2023, 08:59 PM   #5
drolston
Senior Member
 
drolston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 1,627
Default Re: Rear Cam Bearing Interference with Fuel Pump Pushrod

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Ground down the diameter of the bottom half inch of the push rod by about 3/32", slowly and without getting it very hot, so as to not ruin the temper of the contact surface. Pumps fine now. No effect on oil pressure. The load on that pushrod is pretty light compared to the valve springs, so I do not expect to have a wear problem. I will report back if anything adverse develops.
drolston is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 AM.