Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-30-2017, 08:36 PM   #1
1crosscut
Senior Member
 
1crosscut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 1,909
Default Another carburetor identification question

I have a carburetor that a gent wants me to clean up for him. It came off of his 29 pickup. I'm not familiar with this one. It is a Zenith though.
I got all of the jets to come out except the main jet. The screw head of the jet sheared off almost immediately when I put pressure on it to take it out. Getting the rest of it out may be a challenge.
Is the main jet on this carburetor the same as the standard Zenith carbs?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0537.jpg (64.6 KB, 79 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0536.jpg (44.4 KB, 78 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0535.jpg (69.2 KB, 82 views)
__________________
Dave / Lincoln Nebraska
1crosscut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 08:41 PM   #2
darrylkmc
Senior Member
 
darrylkmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 767
Default Re: Another carburetor identification question

Model B, actually post '32 production as the float is '33 and later. Generally work well on Model A engine.

Darryl in Fairbanks
darrylkmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 04-30-2017, 09:11 PM   #3
Ron in Quincy
Senior Member
 
Ron in Quincy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Quincy, CA.
Posts: 1,708
Default Re: Another carburetor identification question

The Carb is a 33-34 Zenith B.

The main Jet that screws into the carb from the bottom is the same as A.

There are two comp. jet , both are in the lower bowl , the larger comp jet is a #18 (.036), also in the lower bowl is a baffle, that is why they changed the float type.

To get the advantage of this carb the A manifold needs to be machined larger at the mounting as the throat is larger than a A carb.

If this carb will be run on an A you do not need the additional spring and plate on the float pin as it is there because the 32-33-and 34 have a fuel pump and its not needed with the gravity feed of the A.

Ron
Ron in Quincy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 09:30 PM   #4
RUNNERBUN
Senior Member
 
RUNNERBUN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Queensland Australia
Posts: 640
Default Re: Another carburetor identification question

After drilling out of what is left of the broken main jet you may have to chase the thread. If so you will need to use a 5mm 75 pitch tap
__________________
Adjust your points with gentle blows of a 2 pound hammer
RUNNERBUN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 10:26 PM   #5
Charlie Stephens
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 7,032
Default Re: Another carburetor identification question

When you install this carburetor on a Model A manifold you will find it to be at a slight angle. The Model A suppliers have a bolt with a step that will correct this situation. Either that or you can start grinding.

Charlie Stephens
Charlie Stephens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 10:37 PM   #6
darrylkmc
Senior Member
 
darrylkmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 767
Default Re: Another carburetor identification question

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie Stephens View Post
When you install this carburetor on a Model A manifold you will find it to be at a slight angle. The Model A suppliers have a bolt with a step that will correct this situation. Either that or you can start grinding.

Charlie Stephens

Actually it is the Model B Intake Manifold that causes the alignment issue instead of the carb. B manifold hole locations are angled as B's use a choke cable in lieu of the rod.

Darryl in Fairbanks
darrylkmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 10:53 PM   #7
Tom Wesenberg
Senior Member
 
Tom Wesenberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 27,582
Default Re: Another carburetor identification question

Quote:
Originally Posted by RUNNERBUN View Post
After drilling out of what is left of the broken main jet you may have to chase the thread. If so you will need to use a 5mm 75 pitch tap
I got very lucky one time with a broken jet in the carb. I bought a set of left hand drill bits, then used my variable speed drill on slow speed to drill down a little and let the bit bite into the brass. It then spun it right out. Or, should I say left out.
Tom Wesenberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 11:30 PM   #8
Big hammer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Land of Lincoln
Posts: 3,131
Default Re: Another carburetor identification question

When working on iron carburetors if you would soak them in Evaporust before trying to remove hardware, jet, etc, you will find that frozen parts will come out very easy :-)
That is what I have found, I believe Evaporust works like penetrating oil !
Yes I love Evaporust, it will not harm solid metals ! And I don't work for them or get any kind of pay from them.
Big hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2017, 07:22 AM   #9
Joe K
Senior Member
 
Joe K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cow Hampshire
Posts: 4,188
Default Re: Another carburetor identification question

Electrolytic methods work well at "undoing" rust too.

Rust occupies about 1.5X the space that the parent metal does - hence things "rust together" rather than "rusting apart." (That comes later.)

Electrolytic undoes this and eases disassembly. And does not affect copper base alloys.

Vince Falter does it with a carbon electrode - which I thought was a nice touch and removes any wire brushing clean up requirement after treatment.

http://www.fordgarage.com/pages/elec...cderusting.htm

I will take slight issue with some of Vince's statements. The problem with electrolytic methods is it leaves a surface which is "optimal" to recombine with oxygen. Use of a carbon electrode does not change this. And one of the reasons one should follow up electrolytic methods with SOMETHING. Either phosphate wash, quick glass bead, certainly a quick prime coat - ANYTHING to change that optimal chemical pre-conditioning for oxidation that electrolytic methods leave.

Still, as usual, Vince does a nice job and the clean up aspect of carbon is undisputed.

People wonder why I don't clean my hands after doing parts prep?

The answer is - I DID - and it didn't help. Something about organic tissue and Ferrous Oxide - Fe3O4 (black rust.)

Joe K
__________________
Shudda kept the horse.

Last edited by Joe K; 05-01-2017 at 07:34 AM.
Joe K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2017, 06:47 PM   #10
1crosscut
Senior Member
 
1crosscut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 1,909
Default Re: Another carburetor identification question

Thanks to everyone for the information and advice. Always nice to lean something each and everyday.
__________________
Dave / Lincoln Nebraska
1crosscut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2017, 10:13 PM   #11
Bob C
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,753
Default Re: Another carburetor identification question

Vince has a lot of information on his web site about that carburetor. Go to the link and scroll down to carburetors. Pay attention to the part about the Power Jet Tube, some times they are missing.
http://www.fordgarage.com/

Bob
Bob C is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 AM.