Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Late V8 (1954+)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-19-2025, 06:06 AM   #1
raceron1120
Senior Member
 
raceron1120's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ellsworth Michigan
Posts: 1,818
Default 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion

Recently I got into a discussion on another site about the engines used in 1956 F800s & maybe other Big Job trucks. Some are saying they were 332s (not the later FE series).
I always & maybe mistakenly thought there was just one Lincoln Yblock version & it was a 302.

Or were both sizes used in the big trucks during that period?

302 A.jpg

302 b.jpg
raceron1120 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2025, 06:14 AM   #2
ms fowler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 172
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion

Sure LOOKS like a Y block to me.

Here is a link to a brochure for 1956 F900 trucks and has details on the 332 engine. They call it the "Torque King Y8"
http://www.lov2xlr8.no/brochures/ford/56_9/56_9.html

Interesting that they call 3.66" a short stroke. I guess it is all relative.
ms fowler is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 04-19-2025, 06:26 AM   #3
raceron1120
Senior Member
 
raceron1120's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ellsworth Michigan
Posts: 1,818
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by ms fowler View Post
Sure LOOKS like a Y block to me.

Here is a link to a brochure for 1956 F900 trucks and has details on the 332 engine.
Thanks for that info, I had never seen it before. BUT - wasn't there also a 302 cid version of that same basic design engine? Perhaps it was available in the smaller "big trucks" (F500s & 600s)? I don't know.

I was a Ford truck parts guy in the early/mid 70s; some of those old trucks were still on the road at the time but not enough for me to be very well educated on the details.
raceron1120 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2025, 06:59 AM   #4
ms fowler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 172
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion

I am not a Y block expert--I am sure some will chime in later--
There were several versions of the Y. Ford introduced it as 239 cubic inches and later increased it to 272, 292 and 312, No factory 302 Y block that I know of.
There was also a Lincoln version of the Y, similar but with some detail changes-- 317, 341 and 368 cubic inches.
ms fowler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2025, 10:17 AM   #5
dmsfrr
Senior Member
 
dmsfrr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Abq, NM
Posts: 3,697
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion

The pair of ridges on the valve covers at each hold-down bolt are likely one of the easiest ways to identify that engine as a Lincoln Y-block.
Quote:
Originally Posted by raceron1120 View Post
. . . BUT - wasn't there also a 302 cid version of that same basic design engine? . . .
Yes there was.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ms fowler View Post
. . .
There was also a Lincoln version of the Y, similar but with some detail changes-- 317, 341 and 368 cubic inches.
There are some images, details and a list of engine block casting ID numbers at this link ...

http://www.ford-y-block.com/lincoln-y.htm


.

Last edited by dmsfrr; 04-19-2025 at 10:43 AM.
dmsfrr is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2025, 10:31 AM   #6
raceron1120
Senior Member
 
raceron1120's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ellsworth Michigan
Posts: 1,818
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmsfrr View Post
. . .There are some images, details and a list of engine block casting numbers at this link ...
http://www.ford-y-block.com/lincoln-y.htm
.
That link helps a lot. I knew some of the CIDs listed but not all. And yes about the ribbed rocker covers being Lincoln Yblocks, vice the Ford Y's.

Thanks much for the info.
raceron1120 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2025, 10:32 AM   #7
55blacktie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 520
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion

Isn't the 332 the smallest FE series engine and first offered in 1958?
55blacktie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2025, 10:39 AM   #8
dmsfrr
Senior Member
 
dmsfrr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Abq, NM
Posts: 3,697
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by 55blacktie View Post
Isn't the 332 the smallest FE series engine and first offered in 1958?
That seems to be correct. Just not the same engine as a Lincoln 332, except in displacement.
I wouldn't count wikipedia as an authoritative source, but here's what they have to say....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_FE_engine

.

Last edited by dmsfrr; 04-19-2025 at 11:33 AM.
dmsfrr is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2025, 11:29 AM   #9
scicala
Senior Member
 
scicala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Detroit suburb, MI
Posts: 3,777
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by 55blacktie View Post
Isn't the 332 the smallest FE series engine and first offered in 1958?
There was also a Lincoln Y Block used in heavy trucks that was a 332. Not an FE 332 like used in cars in '58 and '59.
The heavy truck Lincoln Y blocks were 279, 302 and 332.

Wikipedia is based on input from people like us, and not really on their research. In this case I would say Wikepedia missed the bulls eye by about a mile.

Sal
scicala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2025, 01:18 PM   #10
raceron1120
Senior Member
 
raceron1120's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ellsworth Michigan
Posts: 1,818
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion

Same cubic inch displacement between some of the FORD Y's and the LINCOLN/BIG TRUCK Y's just ads to the confusion, eh?

I don't think there's any major parts between the 2 different engine configurations that are interchangeable.
raceron1120 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2025, 02:40 PM   #11
55blacktie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 520
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by raceron1120 View Post
Same cubic inch displacement between some of the FORD Y's and the LINCOLN/BIG TRUCK Y's just ads to the confusion, eh?

I don't think there's any major parts between the 2 different engine configurations that are interchangeable.
Only the distributor (with the right gear) and the oil pump.
55blacktie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2025, 04:30 PM   #12
mercman from oz
Senior Member
 
mercman from oz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 11,765
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion



1956 Ford Truck Engines
mercman from oz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2025, 05:04 PM   #13
mercman from oz
Senior Member
 
mercman from oz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 11,765
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion



mercman from oz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2025, 05:23 PM   #14
scicala
Senior Member
 
scicala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Detroit suburb, MI
Posts: 3,777
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by mercman from oz View Post


1956 Ford Truck Engines
The 279 LLincoln Y Block (not shown in this '56 ad) was only offered in '52 thru '55.

Sal
scicala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2025, 01:27 AM   #15
mercman from oz
Senior Member
 
mercman from oz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 11,765
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion



1955 Ford Truck V-8 Engines
mercman from oz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2025, 01:31 AM   #16
mercman from oz
Senior Member
 
mercman from oz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 11,765
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion



1955 Ford 279 & 317 CID Cargo King V-8's
mercman from oz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2025, 10:16 AM   #17
1942deluxe
Senior Member
 
1942deluxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Albion, PA
Posts: 955
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion

Something weird I have in my stash of NOS parts is a FAD-12127-B distributor head. The only reference I could find indicated it fit 54-55 600-700 with a 256 cubic inch engine. That would be a Y block truck engine?
1942deluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2025, 06:31 PM   #18
raceron1120
Senior Member
 
raceron1120's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ellsworth Michigan
Posts: 1,818
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1942deluxe View Post
Something weird I have in my stash of NOS parts is a FAD-12127-B distributor head. The only reference I could find indicated it fit 54-55 600-700 with a 256 cubic inch engine. That would be a Y block truck engine?
I think the 256's are Merc Yblocks and might've also been used in '54 Ford police cars. Subject to correction, but I don't think they were the Lincoln-style Yblocks, and I don't know if they were used in trucks.
raceron1120 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2025, 10:09 PM   #19
55blacktie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 520
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by raceron1120 View Post
I think the 256's are Merc Yblocks and might've also been used in '54 Ford police cars. Subject to correction, but I don't think they were the Lincoln-style Yblocks, and I don't know if they were used in trucks.
Correct. The 256 is a Mercury Y-block. It's the same as the 239, except it has a larger bore (3.62 vs. 3.50).
55blacktie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2025, 08:53 AM   #20
Lamar Wadsworth
Senior Member
 
Lamar Wadsworth's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 328
Default Re: 1956 Big Truck Engines - confusion

If I remember right, the '54-56 cop cars had Merc engines and the rear end that was used on station wagons, sedan deliveries, and Tbirds.
Lamar Wadsworth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 PM.