Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-26-2017, 10:08 AM   #21
JohnLaVoy
Senior Member
 
JohnLaVoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Rocklin, CA
Posts: 779
Default Re: updraft vs. downdraft carbs

We have the Weber system on a couple of cars and find the system works great much improved over the updraft.
JohnLaVoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2017, 12:49 PM   #22
Jim Brierley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,085
Default Re: updraft vs. downdraft carbs

I agree with simonpie. The main difference is the most-used downdrafts flow more air. The Model A is a big engine and can use much more than the stock carb.
Jim Brierley is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-27-2017, 06:03 AM   #23
updraught
Senior Member
 
updraught's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,969
Default Re: updraft vs. downdraft carbs

Thanks Jim.

Those hotrod types were getting jolly unruly.
updraught is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2017, 08:30 AM   #24
Railcarmover
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,262
Default Re: updraft vs. downdraft carbs

Quote:
Originally Posted by updraught View Post
Thanks Jim.

Those hotrod types were getting jolly unruly.

Railcarmover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2017, 09:34 AM   #25
Logan
Senior Member
 
Logan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,055
Default Re: updraft vs. downdraft carbs

I've run the stock carb, webers, stromberg 81, 48, and 97's. And strombergs are by far my favorite. They're easy to tune, jets are easily accessible, and in my opinion have more "oomf" behind them than a Weber. The Weber is a progressive two barrel where as the stromberg uses 2 barrels all the time. I like having my power all the time over the little bit better mpg the Weber will give you. I really like the new 97's being built, I've installed probebly close to 5 on customer cars, 2 on mine, as well as a couple rebuilt strombergs and I've never heard a complaint from customers or myself. I've switched out 5 webers for strombergs and all had posotive reviews once the exchange was done.
__________________
Cowtown A's
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2017, 11:13 AM   #26
Jim Brierley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,085
Default Re: updraft vs. downdraft carbs

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Logan, interesting! Please don't tell updraught that I am a hot-rodder, an old one!
Jim Brierley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2017, 12:20 PM   #27
CarlG
Senior Member
 
CarlG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 9,115
Default Re: updraft vs. downdraft carbs

I am pretty much with Logan. I went thru 2 Webers before I got the new 97 (at the urging of my engine builder). Have been really happy with the 97.
__________________
Alaskan A's
Antique Auto Mushers of Alaska
Model A Ford Club of America
Model A Restorers Club
Antique Automobile Club of America
Mullins Owner's Club
CarlG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2017, 05:07 PM   #28
George Miller
Senior Member
 
George Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 2,975
Default Re: updraft vs. downdraft carbs

A lot of it is about the manifold design. I have good luck with 94,s make my own intake.
George Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2017, 05:37 PM   #29
zzlegend
Senior Member
 
zzlegend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Reseda, Calif.
Posts: 2,188
Default Re: updraft vs. downdraft carbs

I go along with George. 94's are what I run on my Flathead and my A motor. Easy to re-jet and tune duals. But hey,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,its like the old saying..............................
"There's an ass for every saddle". Run what you like.
zzlegend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2017, 06:41 PM   #30
George Miller
Senior Member
 
George Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 2,975
Default Re: updraft vs. downdraft carbs

Quote:
Originally Posted by zzlegend View Post
I go along with George. 94's are what I run on my Flathead and my A motor. Easy to re-jet and tune duals. But hey,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,its like the old saying..............................
"There's an ass for every saddle". Run what you like.
I totally agree every one should run what works for them.
George Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2017, 01:29 PM   #31
Purdy Swoft
Senior Member
 
Purdy Swoft's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 8,099
Default Re: updraft vs. downdraft carbs

My experience with dual updraft manifolds is that if the runner or tube size is too small, installing larger carbs or carbs with larger venturi area will show no improvement over what dual carbs with model A venturi area would allow . My cast iron Uniflo dual updraft manifold that was made for model B use outperforms my cast iron Trojan intake , Both running model B carbs with larger venturis . I feel that turning a Vortex dual updraft manifold that has smaller model A size runners , up side down and installing larger dual throat carbs would have a similar effect .On the other hand the smaller runners could still dump plenty of raw gas while flooding the engine when used in a down draft manner . Its not all about more or larger carbs . Manifold design plays a bigger part .

Last edited by Purdy Swoft; 12-28-2017 at 01:37 PM.
Purdy Swoft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2017, 02:58 PM   #32
Railcarmover
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,262
Default Re: updraft vs. downdraft carbs

Weber ICT's are single venturi carbs,34mm.They match the bolt pattern and runner on the vortex intake.
Railcarmover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2017, 03:31 PM   #33
txkhog
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Texarkana, TX
Posts: 61
Default Re: updraft vs. downdraft carbs

Also a down draft would get the carb and intake away from the exhaust header temperature
txkhog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2017, 03:47 PM   #34
Purdy Swoft
Senior Member
 
Purdy Swoft's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 8,099
Default Re: updraft vs. downdraft carbs

Actually , i'm really not familiar with the different Weber carbs . The ones that I've read about have been used on smaller engines like used in the Vega . The models 81 , 97 , 94 & 48 Stromberg style two throat two barrell carbs would have to use adaptors that would mate with a smaller diameter single throat manifold . It seems to me that a manifold that had larger runners and was designed to be used with the dual throut two barrel carb would give better performance and fit .We are talking about different style and type carbs . no harm meant I also consider manifold size and flow .
Purdy Swoft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2017, 01:12 AM   #35
Tom Wesenberg
Senior Member
 
Tom Wesenberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 27,582
Default Re: updraft vs. downdraft carbs

Quote:
Originally Posted by txkhog View Post
Also a down draft would get the carb and intake away from the exhaust header temperature
The problem with a downdraft is when you stop, all the exhaust heat goes up and boils the fuel out of the carb. This wasn't a problem in the 70's when we had good gas, but today's gas boils much too quickly.
Tom Wesenberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 PM.