|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: charlottesville, Va.
Posts: 590
|
Randy
If you never get here to see me I will take you a man that owens two 32 three windows. The next tme I see him I will try to get the body numbers for you. They are both orginial. He also owens a standerd phaton. Kind of rare. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Austin
Posts: 697
|
Sounds great, Allen, hope to take you up on that real soon!
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 13
|
Randy,
This is a great idea. I have owned two '32 3 windows, actually the first was just the body with no other parts, not even the wood or door jamb tin. It was missing the doors and had a gutted deck lid. I believe it was a trunk car. I paid $150 in 1974 and sold it in 1975 for $350.00. It was a beautiful body with the floor intact , no rust and unchopped. I do not remember it having a body tag. My second '32 window I purchased in 1993 for $2,500 and it was an ex-race car. No floor, so no body tag either, gutted doors and no deck lid. My old boss from 1973 found it in the early '80s and he traded off for bodywork on another project to an old body man. As a matter of fact, I worked with this same body man when I was in high school in the mid '70s. I worked with him again at a different shop in the late '80s. That is when I learned the body man had the 3 window body sitting in his backyard and the recent history. Everyone in the shop tried to buy the body, but in 1993 I prevailed and brought it home. It has a trunk and it is now sitting on a Pete Eastwood chassis in my garage. If I can figure out how to post photos I will send some over in the next day or so. I have found a right door to repair mine. I still need an original left door inner panel to repair the other door. I could also use some original garnish moldings. These '32 Fords are very cool and we sure had a lot of them at Deuce Week at the Petersen Museum March 3rd. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
|
David do you have any photos of Deuce week .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 13
|
Flathead Ted,
I was on the planning committee for 17 months. It was a great event. We could have used more '32 Fords and more people. Send me your email address and I will send some photos. [email protected] David Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Austin
Posts: 697
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Thanks to all who contributed to this post. To date, we've identified 25 Deuce 3Ws with body tags, several more with missing tags. Here is the list of the body #s identified from Fordbarn, the H.A.M.B., and DeucesLimited.com: 239 267 352 441 483 694 1636 1701 3103 4749 4988 5429 5576 5652 5956 7538 7622 7993 8214 8612 8830 9424 10293 11746 12660 Last edited by Randy; 02-08-2014 at 09:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: canada
Posts: 124
|
My car is very likely Canadian built but every obvious sign is gone. There were no tags and the car had been channeled. I didn't think to check the frame numbers before I painted it. I haven't even been able to find out who owned mine before the owner before me had it. Is there anything on the body it's self. My car was not drilled out for the cowl lights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 26
|
One more to add... B520B-2095 --- Original rumble, once poorly converted to a trunk, now back to a rumble. The obvious thing, this plate has B520B crudely stamped, where others posted in this thread look like the four digit body type was screened like the rest of the plate and only the unique number was stamped. Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Austin
Posts: 697
|
Thanks for posting. Not sure, this is the first one I've seen like this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Austin
Posts: 697
|
Just added this one from ebay, #5628:
![]() Thanks to all who contributed to this and other posts we've identified 36 Deuce 3Ws with body tags, several more with missing tags. Here is the list of the body #s identified from Fordbarn, the H.A.M.B., and DeucesLimited.com: 239 250 267 352 441 483 694 1636 1701 2095 2643 3103 4054 4749 4945 4988 5429 5576 5628 5652 5956 7538 7622 7993 8214 8295 8612 8830 9020 9424 9548 9744 10293 11333 11746 12660 Last edited by Randy; 02-08-2014 at 09:34 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: North Berwick, Maine
Posts: 141
|
Here's another for you; B520B-2643 Rumble seat, 84xxx, July of 32, Murray Body
Last edited by lowride; 08-20-2012 at 01:59 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Austin
Posts: 697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PETALUMA CALI
Posts: 106
|
B520A-8295 i sold 1n 1974 to buy B520A-9020 i still have it today and B520A 4945 belongs to a friend. and prob 5 to 6 more in Marin and sonoma county.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Napa,California
Posts: 6,773
|
Mike,there's also a nice old original over here in Napa. The owner just joined the V-8 Club at my encouragement and will probably bring the car to Lake Tahoe in June. The car still has the original interior.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Northern B.C., Canada
Posts: 12
|
I have a Henry original 3w that I bought back in '82 for the outrageous sum of $1000. No body tag, as it was heavily channeled before my time.
__________________
You can touch the coupe, just don't fondle the chicken. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,670
|
Randy,
Given the relatively modest magnitude of the individual body numbers reported to date (with 12,660 being the highest) relative to the total body build, I am beginning to suspect that the two types (A-trunk and B-rumble) may have been numbered separately and not consecutively without regard to the type. In other words, perhaps two sets of numbers were used on the U.S.-built bodies which were additive in order to know the total number of bodies built. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,670
|
Judging from BoxCar Tom's body and engine numbers, it would seem my theory about two separate sets of numbers has some merit. Further given the grand total, more A-suffix bodies were evidently built than B-suffix bodies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Austin
Posts: 697
|
Quote:
Interesting theory and that makes since, since we don't have any numbers in the teens and twenties! I guess we'll know for sure if we get a duplicate number on A vs. B. That is curious about the # of trunk models vs. rumble. I guess Ford would have had some sales history to look back on illustrating the popularity of the rumble seat, maybe someone knows the percentage of Model A coupes that were sold with rumble seats? Last edited by Randy; 09-05-2012 at 08:30 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PETALUMA CALI
Posts: 106
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 10,670
|
Ford's '32 production records only distinguish between engine type (four or V-8) by model. There is no further breakdown of optional (at extra cost) equipment such as a rumble seat on a deluxe coupe (or standard coupe or standard roadster).
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|