Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Late V8 (1954+)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-11-2026, 12:39 PM   #21
jakesbackyard
Member
 
jakesbackyard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wahpeton, ND
Posts: 82
Default Re: 1956 Thunderbird power brake problem

When I got this car everything had been either replaced or rebuilt when frame off restored on ‘93-‘95. I got 7 totes of used and new parts that were replaced, rebuilt or upgraded. In those parts were a brand new unused large booster vacuum diaphram, a small diaphram and other used rebuild booster parts. It had been converted to dot 5 fluid which is clean and nice. I have 45” vacuum on the main line to the booster. So right now I’m thinking I may just take it apart, look it over, put in new diaphragms and see what happens. The kit to rebuild is crazy priced.
jakesbackyard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2026, 01:58 PM   #22
miker98038
Senior Member
 
miker98038's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kent, WA. Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,765
Default Re: 1956 Thunderbird power brake problem

Nice ride. I’ve lays thought the 56 with the Connie kit gone and the dagmar’s was the best look. So I’m no cringing.

Is the 45” a typo? I’m think 15 would be closer.
miker98038 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 04-11-2026, 05:11 PM   #23
jakesbackyard
Member
 
jakesbackyard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wahpeton, ND
Posts: 82
Default Re: 1956 Thunderbird power brake problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by miker98038 View Post
Nice ride. I’ve lays thought the 56 with the Connie kit gone and the dagmar’s was the best look. So I’m no cringing.

Is the 45” a typo? I’m think 15 would be closer.
Haha…a senior moment. Read the wrong side of gauge. It has 18” vacuum.

Has anyone used a VH44 booster which is available real reasonable?
jakesbackyard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2026, 06:22 PM   #24
miker98038
Senior Member
 
miker98038's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kent, WA. Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,765
Default Re: 1956 Thunderbird power brake problem

Here’s an old link to the HAMB. I don’t write off stuff just because it’s from overseas. You can read it and draw your own conclusions. But if you’ve got it on hand and can check it out first, worth a shot.

https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/...sters.1216131/
miker98038 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2026, 07:27 PM   #25
jakesbackyard
Member
 
jakesbackyard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wahpeton, ND
Posts: 82
Default Re: 1956 Thunderbird power brake problem

Here’s the one I’m trying to find a little more info on…
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3666.jpg (19.6 KB, 8 views)
jakesbackyard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2026, 07:41 PM   #26
miker98038
Senior Member
 
miker98038's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kent, WA. Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,765
Default Re: 1956 Thunderbird power brake problem

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
That’s mentioned in post #4. It appears they’re Chinese replacements for an Australian company no longer making them. Used on factory cars down under. So quality control is always under question. Also some old price comparisons to domestic products.

The real answer is to compare the line pressure from the master to the booster, and then from the booster to the brakes. But that requires a set of gauge and at least a couple t fittings to do it right. Or just dead head it one at a time at full leg pressure. But either way then you get to re bleed everything.

Best of my knowledge Ford didn’t use 2 different pivot ratios off the pedal for power/non power. And there’s no easy way to change that on a bird-no second hole drilled, or much room for it.

Way back when I put a similar system (probably identical) on my bird it didn’t balance very well front/rear. Turned out the front pads were the hard “guaranteed for life” cheap replacements. A softer pad in the front disc made a noticeable difference. More stopping for less pressure. And as I think I mentioned, the rears had to be kept in adjustment.

Last edited by miker98038; 04-11-2026 at 07:50 PM.
miker98038 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2026, 09:42 PM   #27
oldbugger
Senior Member
 
oldbugger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Holland Mi
Posts: 761
Default Re: 1956 Thunderbird power brake problem

I see you are using dot 5, I am also on my 64. Could that be the problem
oldbugger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2026, 06:09 AM   #28
jakesbackyard
Member
 
jakesbackyard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wahpeton, ND
Posts: 82
Default Re: 1956 Thunderbird power brake problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldbugger View Post
I see you are using dot 5, I am also on my 64. Could that be the problem
Some say dot 5 is firmer, some say softer. Companies say it should be softer because 5 contains more oxygen. Some say not much difference. It’s anybody’s guess.
jakesbackyard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 AM.