|
|||||||
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NE Illinois
Posts: 499
|
sounds right...do you see any sign at all of leakage??? When you speak of dual reservoir are you segregating your rear brakes from the fronts?? You may also need to install a proportioning valve. Not sure you need a dual reservoir on a car as light as a Model A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Hemet, Ca
Posts: 55
|
It is my understanding that a dual reservoir allow 1 system to fail while leaving the other system intact. That is the only reason I am considering a dual reservoir.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: La Verne California
Posts: 287
|
Quote:
You are correct. The dual reservoir is a fail safe system and I would not have hydraulic brakes without one. I have mechanical brakes on the Tudor and will not change them to hydraulic. Mostly because I want to keep it original and I basically don't drive that fast where it would make a big difference. Let's make no mistake about it. Hydraulic brakes are better stop faster and above all much safer. With the technology used on hydraulic brakes there is no comparison. Ceramic rotors are now employed in auto racing for their superior heat dissipation and elimination of rotors warping. Mechanical vs Hydraulic....no comparison. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Hemet, Ca
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|