Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-29-2011, 08:35 AM   #19
cuzncletus
Senior Member
 
cuzncletus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sevierville, Tenn.
Posts: 391
Default Re: 1.60 chevy valve quetions

Obviously the problem with making horsepower in a flathead is flow both in and out through some very convoluted passages. I'm with JM 35 sedan. I used the 1.6 Manley Chevy valves and lots of port work. There are three ways to get gasses into or out of an engine; volume, velocity, or pressure. I'm not running a blower so pressure is out. Velocity is an impossibility in a flathead because of all the turns creating high pressure zones. The only route left is volume. The additional room around the diameter of the valves plus the reduction of the stem to increase flow near the valve have got to help some. Argueably there could be some reduction in torque with reduced velocity at low speeds but flatheads are basically tractor motors; little torque monsters as were most engines of their day. Can you overflow an engine? Of course. Ford fans have to look no farther than the FoMoCo muscles engines of the late 60's/early 70's. Boss 302's and 429's were street dogs. Every roundtracker knew about epoxying up the intake passages on 351 Clevelands to increase intake velocity. But overflow a flathead? I don't think it's possible.

Just my two cents..........
cuzncletus is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 PM.