|
|||||||
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Fort dodge, Iowa
Posts: 1,460
|
I don’t know, you haven’t convinced me yet. I include a picture for your examination. The nuts are identical. The only difference that I can see is the ferrule for the Ford designated fitting is longer. I believe the nut will compress both ferrules the same. I have to add that it is with GREAT hesitation that I openly disagree with rotorwrench on ANYTHING. LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 11,658
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Fort dodge, Iowa
Posts: 1,460
|
I gotta tell you guys that I just went out to my shop and did an intensive and scientific test to see what I could determine. You can start giggling now if you wish! I took some new 1/4” copper tube and tested a regular nut and ferrule and the “Ford designated” nut/ferrule. I do not think the outer side of the ferrule on EITHER combination does much of a crimp/squish. Like my dad who was born in 1895 would say “Put that in your pipe and smoke it!” Has any of you other old timers heard that saying? I am finding this thread quite enjoyable. LOL
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|