Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-16-2026, 05:46 PM   #1
Bored&Stroked
Senior Member
 
Bored&Stroked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,910
Default Re: Ford flathead adjustable mushroom lifters mystery.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GB SISSON View Post
What is the benefit? More surface area on the lobes?
The wider face allows a more aggressive opening ramp that uses the additional width to open the valve faster/sooner.
Bored&Stroked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2026, 10:17 PM   #2
GB SISSON
Senior Member
 
GB SISSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Orcas Island Washington
Posts: 6,202
Default Re: Ford flathead adjustable mushroom lifters mystery.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bored&Stroked View Post
The wider face allows a more aggressive opening ramp that uses the additional width to open the valve faster/sooner.
Thanks Dale, I get how that would happen. Would these lifters be used in conjunction with a performance/high lift cam, or are they a less expensive alternative to an aftermarket cam? I hope I'm not asking dumb questions, it's just that the workings of valve trains is a really interesting subject to me.
__________________
Owner/Operator of 'Jailbar Ranch' on the side of Mt. Pickett. Current stable consists of 1946 1/2 ton pickup turned woodie wagon with FH V8, 1946 Tonner Pickup with 226 H six, 1979 Toyota landcruiser wagon, now wearing 1947 Ford Jailbar sheet metal. 'Rusty ol' floorboards, hot on their feet' (Alan Jackson)
GB SISSON is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 03-16-2026, 10:37 PM   #3
Bored&Stroked
Senior Member
 
Bored&Stroked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 5,910
Default Re: Ford flathead adjustable mushroom lifters mystery.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GB SISSON View Post
Thanks Dale, I get how that would happen. Would these lifters be used in conjunction with a performance/high lift cam, or are they a less expensive alternative to an aftermarket cam? I hope I'm not asking dumb questions, it's just that the workings of valve trains is a really interesting subject to me.
They are definitely something specifically designed for a cam whose lobe design needs the broader face. If you put them with a cam not designed for them, you'd achieve nothing as no part of that extra diameter would be touched/used.

Mushroom profiles were something that certain cam grinders used to create more aggressive profiles before roller-lifters became the thing. Once roller lifters took hold, my guess is that almost nobody created mushroom profiles since.

Just think about how much fun it is to install and service them! You have to pull the whole damn lower-end down (on a flathead Ford) - just to get to them.

Back in the late 30's, there were companies like Chrysler, Studebaker, Cadillac, etc - that used mushroom lifters in a lot of their engines. I've retrofitted some of these for Bonneville engines (prior to going to roller-lifters)

Radius Lifters: Some folks like Isky created radius lifters - which in a sense are kind of a baby-step towards roller lifters. The big radius on a non-rotating lifter allowed more aggressive profiles and ramp speeds to be used. The big issues there are having to index the lifters, premature wear, etc.. While we like to talk about Isky's 404A radius cam (and others - Crane, etc), the usage of these lifter designs was quite limited and not popular at all with street driven vehicles.
Bored&Stroked is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM.