Shoud I relieve my block

[Ronnieroadster]

Pete its been my experience the more I opened up the combustion chamber in the head and the relief as well we continued to make more power. No humps or pathways needed as far as I have determined.
Ronnieroadster

[Bored&Stroked]

Originally Posted by Ronnieroadster

Pete its been my experience the more I opened up the combustion chamber in the head and the relief as well we continued to make more power. No humps or pathways needed as far as I have determined.
Ronnieroadster

Generally, I'd agree - though when you're running a supercharger/blower or any forced induction, it is a different beast than a NA situation. The quest is how to increase flow and also maintain or increase compression.

If you look at the Harley KR's, they were ALL about flow and compression was not the bigger issue. BUT they had huge duration/overlap in their cams, tight lobe centers, fantastic ports, huge valves and very specifically designed chambers. They were also very high RPM flatheads - they spun them at 8,000 rpm all the time, so low-end power was really not the issue . . . higher RPM horsepower (which means flow) was the issue.

One thing I believe in as it relates to the Harley KR design is the flow-ramp across the cylinder. If you look at the pictures I've posted, the flow comes across from the intake to the bore. I suspect this is a very important aspect of the design - and resulting performance.

The intake charge had a very easy path down the cylinder (and it swirled the charge) and the bore was not covered up by the head chamber. Also, as the design used a pop-up, the chamber was "out of the way" of the flow once the piston was 3/16" down the bore.

The pop-up opened up the opportunity for flow, without sacrificing compression. To me, this is the beauty of the design. This is exactly what I did in the FlatCAD design - following the specific design notes of Jerry Branch with his Harley KR mods.

Another thing I've done is to put a heavy radius on the leading edge of the pistons for two reasons. 1) to reduce the tendency for the edge to overheat. 2) It helps flow get over the top of the piston as the piston starts to move down the bore. Here is what the pistons/deck look like presently - as I'm currently getting the engine ready for Bonneville (flathead Cadillac):

IMG_0076.jpg

69307476044__EA44891C-31EC-4D17-B161-C71AAB3869D1.jpg


For those who are interested, do some searches for the articles that Jerry Branch published on modifications to the Harley KR (back in the 60's).

[petehoovie]

Originally Posted by Bored&Stroked

Generally, I'd agree - though when you're running a supercharger/blower or any forced induction, it is a different beast than a NA situation. The quest is how to increase flow and also maintain or increase compression.

If you look at the Harley KR's, they were ALL about flow and compression was not the bigger issue. BUT they had huge duration/overlap in their cams, tight lobe centers, fantastic ports, huge valves and very specifically designed chambers. They were also very high RPM flatheads - they spun them at 8,000 rpm all the time, so low-end power was really not the issue . . . higher RPM horsepower (which means flow) was the issue.

One thing I believe in as it relates to the Harley KR design is the flow-ramp across the cylinder. If you look at the pictures I've posted, the flow comes across from the intake to the bore. I suspect this is a very important aspect of the design - and resulting performance.

The intake charge had a very easy path down the cylinder (and it swirled the charge) and the bore was not covered up by the head chamber. Also, as the design used a pop-up, the chamber was "out of the way" of the flow once the piston was 3/16" down the bore.

The pop-up opened up the opportunity for flow, without sacrificing compression. To me, this is the beauty of the design. This is exactly what I did in the FlatCAD design - following the specific design notes of Jerry Branch with his Harley KR mods.

Another thing I've done is to put a heavy radius on the leading edge of the pistons for two reasons. 1) to reduce the tendency for the edge to overheat. 2) It helps flow get over the top of the piston as the piston starts to move down the bore. Here is what the pistons/deck look like presently - as I'm currently getting the engine ready for Bonneville (flathead Cadillac):

Attachment 531719

Attachment 531720


For those who are interested, do some searches for the articles that Jerry Branch published on modifications to the Harley KR (back in the 60's).