|
|||||||
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,229
|
A followup to the recut dome EAB head installation on my 260" Merc. I've run a few tanks of gas through it now, and where it previously delivered 16.5-17 mpg I am now seeing 18-18.7 mpg. The extra torque from the compression increase really has made a difference.
Terry
__________________
"It don't take but country smarts to solve the problem" (Smokey Yunick) '30 Model A Speedster '41 Merc Town Sedan / 260" 8CM engine '66 Fairlane four door / "warmed up" 302
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 1,647
|
Terry, thanks for the update.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,137
|
Quote:
The amount of improvement is much more than the normal theoretical improvement in power for a compression bump. I suspect this is because the theoretical compression benefits are not taking into account the improved combustion chamber dynamics that can be had in our ancient design side valve motors. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|