Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-2018, 09:29 AM   #1
Oldbluoval
Senior Member
 
Oldbluoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Signal Mtn, TN (SE TN)
Posts: 2,672
Default Re: Trunk vs rumble seat...

The "romance" of a rumble seat is WAY over-rated.

A. They are hard to get in and out of, period (well, unless you are less than 15 years old)
B. They are dangerous to ride in them. In an accident, one could be decapitated or thrown into the front panel
C. They leave no feasible room for storing much of anything.
D. They run up the cost of a resto.
E. Too small and cramped for romance (that's where I started this!)

Want to hear my diatribe on side-mounts!!!!!
Oldbluoval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2018, 12:29 PM   #2
HoarseWhisperer
Senior Member
 
HoarseWhisperer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,470
Default Re: Trunk vs rumble seat...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldbluoval View Post
The "romance" of a rumble seat is WAY over-rated.

A. They are hard to get in and out of, period (well, unless you are less than 15 years old)
B. They are dangerous to ride in them. In an accident, one could be decapitated or thrown into the front panel
C. They leave no feasible room for storing much of anything.
D. They run up the cost of a resto.
E. Too small and cramped for romance (that's where I started this!)

Want to hear my diatribe on side-mounts!!!!!
Oh, no! I opted for the rumble seat and side mount because they were unique to the era. How could I have gone so wrong?

__________________
I know a lot of things; I just can't remember them all.

1928 CCPU 82-A
1931 Roadster 40-B Dlx (Canadian)
HoarseWhisperer is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 02-16-2018, 01:20 PM   #3
CHuDWah
Senior Member
 
CHuDWah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Kritter Krick, Flaw-duh
Posts: 1,171
Default Re: Trunk vs rumble seat...

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoarseWhisperer View Post
Oh, no! I opted for the rumble seat and side mount because they were unique to the era. How could I have gone so wrong?


Well, yeah, you gotta have a rumble - there's no windows in a roadster for the dog to stick its head out!
CHuDWah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2018, 01:05 PM   #4
CHuDWah
Senior Member
 
CHuDWah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Kritter Krick, Flaw-duh
Posts: 1,171
Default Re: Trunk vs rumble seat...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldbluoval View Post
The "romance" of a rumble seat is WAY over-rated.

A. They are hard to get in and out of, period (well, unless you are less than 15 years old)
B. They are dangerous to ride in them. In an accident, one could be decapitated or thrown into the front panel
C. They leave no feasible room for storing much of anything.
D. They run up the cost of a resto.
E. Too small and cramped for romance (that's where I started this!)

Want to hear my diatribe on side-mounts!!!!!

I've never had a trunk but I did have a rumble and yeah, this ^^^ - never again! (Course E. applies to pretty much every A, except maybe the back of an AA. )
CHuDWah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2018, 05:47 PM   #5
Anton Voycheck
Member
 
Anton Voycheck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Laredo, Texas
Posts: 64
Default Re: Trunk vs rumble seat...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldbluoval View Post


Want to hear my diatribe on side-mounts!!!!!



I am betting we agree on this
Anton Voycheck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 PM.