Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2016, 11:56 PM   #1
51 MERC-CT
Senior Member
 
51 MERC-CT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Hartford, Ct
Posts: 5,898
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Floored View Post

The Lincoln 337 engine conquered "La Carerra Pan Americana" a couple times powering the cars through a tremendous torture test.
The cars were not powered by a 337 Flathead but by an OHV engine first used in 1952.
__________________
DON'T RECALL DOING SOMETHING FOR MYSELF BASED ON SOMEONE ELSE'S LIKES OR DISLIKES
51 MERC-CT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2016, 09:43 AM   #2
skidmarks
Senior Member
 
skidmarks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: newark, delaware
Posts: 3,841
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

We
Quote:
Originally Posted by 51 MERC-CT View Post
The cars were not powered by a 337 Flathead but by an OHV engine first used in 1952.
They are talking about the 49 to 51 lincoln flathead that was used also in ford trucks f7 and F8.
The 52 ohv was either a 279 or a 317 and looks like a big Y block. Same deal lincoln cars and ford F7 f8 trucks starting in 1952.I had two big trucks with them . A 55 ford tandem t750 and a 61 ford F800.

Or did you mean the winning road race car was a 52 lincoln and they never raced the flathead lincoln?
skidmarks is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-18-2016, 11:45 AM   #3
51 MERC-CT
Senior Member
 
51 MERC-CT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Hartford, Ct
Posts: 5,898
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by skidmarks View Post

Or did you mean the winning road race car was a 52 lincoln and they never raced the flathead lincoln?
Exactly.
__________________
DON'T RECALL DOING SOMETHING FOR MYSELF BASED ON SOMEONE ELSE'S LIKES OR DISLIKES
51 MERC-CT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2016, 12:31 PM   #4
Henry Floored
Senior Member
 
Henry Floored's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 630
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by 51 MERC-CT View Post
The cars were not powered by a 337 Flathead but by an OHV engine first used in 1952.
The 337 Lincolns were raced in '50 and '51. While they didn't win overall they ran very competitively with the new OHV Gm V8's most notably the Olds 88.

There are pictures of these 337 Lincolns getting airborne during the race. They couldn't have been all that bad.
Henry Floored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2016, 02:04 PM   #5
V8COOPMAN
Senior Member
 
V8COOPMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,184
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Floored View Post
The 337 Lincolns were raced in '50 and '51. While they didn't win overall they ran very competitively with the new OHV Gm V8's most notably the Olds 88.
Those Olds V8s were ONLY 303 CU IN. DD
__________________
Click Links Below __


'35-'36 W/8BA & MECHANICAL FAN


T5 W/TORQUE TUBE
V8COOPMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2016, 07:26 PM   #6
Henry Floored
Senior Member
 
Henry Floored's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 630
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Quote:
Originally Posted by V8COOPMAN View Post
Those Olds V8s were ONLY 303 CU IN. DD
Don't know what to make of this. The Hudson Hornets used to give 'em fits.
Henry Floored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2016, 08:36 PM   #7
skidmarks
Senior Member
 
skidmarks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: newark, delaware
Posts: 3,841
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Floored View Post
Don't know what to make of this. The Hudson Hornets used to give 'em fits.
49 to 53 were 303 ci. 54 it went to 324
skidmarks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2016, 07:10 AM   #8
Walt Dupont--Me.
Senior Member
 
Walt Dupont--Me.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Gardiner Me.
Posts: 4,200
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by skidmarks View Post
49 to 53 were 303 ci. 54 it went to 324
Then they went to 370, I worked for the Olds - Cad Co. in 57 to 60. Walt
Walt Dupont--Me. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2016, 08:20 AM   #9
Henry Floored
Senior Member
 
Henry Floored's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 630
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walt Dupont--Me. View Post
Then they went to 370, I worked for the Olds - Cad Co. in 57 to 60. Walt
Walt I mean this with all due respect either OHV Ford engines were actually terrible or they they had an undeserved terrible reputation during the 50's because it appears to me that hot rodders would convert to any brand OHV except for Ford.

This has bothered me my whole life. Seems like a shame that Ford let their reputation as a V8 company go to hell after the Flathead era.

It is kind of an ironic twist that for two years straight a Ford Y-block has taken top honors in the "vintage engine" class at the Amsoil Engine Masters competition. The class is only two years old.

Now the winners were pretty well built Y-blocks obviously created by two different true "engine masters", but there were also solid performances by less aggressive combinations and even a surprise result from a 368 Lincoln and a 430 MEL.

What was wrong with OHV Fords in the 1950's?
Henry Floored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2017, 10:39 PM   #10
40 Deluxe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: now Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 3,835
Default Re: Pros and cons of Lincoln flatheads

Quote:
Originally Posted by V8COOPMAN View Post
Those Olds V8s were ONLY 303 CU IN. DD
Do you think that they remained 303 cu. in. in the race cars??
40 Deluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 PM.