Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Early V8 (1932-53)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-04-2015, 05:39 PM   #1
Ol' Ron
Senior Member
 
Ol' Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chester Vt
Posts: 8,985
Default Re: Reconditioned 37 rods

Ya gota work with the math, The diameter of the crank subtracted from the bore of the rod and tne thickness of the bearing times two, If the numbers add up and the clearance is right. THEN start fitting them. Also you must check for width , especially in the filit radius of the crank. You don;t want to hang up there. I like .015 on the width of the bearing, this lets the oil out of the bearing. Next the rod side clearance should be .008-.010" on a street engine and .015-.020 on a track engine. This allowa plenty of oil flow through the bearing to cool it. But the added clearance makes the rings work harder, but the excess oil on the bottom of the pistons keeps them cool.
Ol' Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2015, 06:11 PM   #2
Mark's 37
Senior Member
 
Mark's 37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Aptos, Ca
Posts: 355
Default Re: Reconditioned 37 rods

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ol' Ron View Post
Ya gota work with the math, The diameter of the crank subtracted from the bore of the rod and tne thickness of the bearing times two, If the numbers add up and the clearance is right. THEN start fitting them. Also you must check for width , especially in the filit radius of the crank. You don;t want to hang up there. I like .015 on the width of the bearing, this lets the oil out of the bearing. Next the rod side clearance should be .008-.010" on a street engine and .015-.020 on a track engine. This allowa plenty of oil flow through the bearing to cool it. But the added clearance makes the rings work harder, but the excess oil on the bottom of the pistons keeps them cool.
Ron,

Edited and corrected the measurements:

My numbers are rod bore = 2.220" minus 2 x .125" bearing thickness(.250") = 1.970" minus crank journal 1.969" = .001" clearance.

Isn't this clearance too much?

Last edited by Mark's 37; 12-04-2015 at 07:19 PM.
Mark's 37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 12-04-2015, 06:22 PM   #3
GOSFAST
Senior Member
 
GOSFAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,052
Default Re: Reconditioned 37 rods

What "undersize" brgs are you working with, that shaft size is .030" under!

Thanks, Gary in N.Y.

P.S. I may be missing something with all your numbers but you cannot run .011" (rod brg) clearance??
GOSFAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2015, 06:34 PM   #4
Mark's 37
Senior Member
 
Mark's 37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Aptos, Ca
Posts: 355
Default Re: Reconditioned 37 rods

Found the error in the math I was doing. Clearance now is .001". The spec I found says .0005-.003". Fat fingers on keys.

The question remains that the bearings are egg shaped. When I sized the bearings to get clearance on the ends, the center part of the bearing is too wide and it won't move freely. I am checking this in a vice, not on the crank itself, the side clearance isn't a problem at this stage. I am wondering if sanding the butt ends of the bearing halves where they meet could remedy this.
Mark's 37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 AM.