|
|||||||
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#20 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,662
|
Quote:
At the risk of topic shift... There is of course way more to the story about replacing street cars than simple chicanery of GM and Firestone. The Pacific Electric streetcars system was suffering numerous woes. The system was wearing out and due to regulation of fares there was not enough income to re-invest in the system. The streetcars shared the public roads and automobile traffic congestion then resulted in horrible service due to "trapped" streetcars, which drove potential customers away. Increasing costs of labor, again with fare adjustment difficult (Track and electric system maintenance had to be paid by the company, not with expenses of street maintenance hidden in the city tax budget as could be done with buses). Replacing the system with buses appeared "cheaper" than fixing the system and raising fares to a sustainable level. The consequences of quality of ride diminishing was not recognized or acknowledged. GM did purchase other streetcar systems which they did keep running for some time, and out and out purchased and scrapped others. It was all done with classic GM bean counting strategic decision making. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
|