Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-08-2012, 10:09 PM   #1
MikeK
Senior Member
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Windy City
Posts: 2,919
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kohnke Rebabbitting View Post

Ge's Mike, that brings back a lot of memories, and I don't know if it was really a (Hundred Million Pascals or Not) ( you Really couldn't get a good count, as they seemed to move faster then the eye, and maybe like you said, can't be seen with the Eye, it sure did seem like it!. Any way, Dad got a 1/2 Pint of Kerosene, in which I told him, that if he wanted to cover the whole area, that he would need a Gallon, but he didn't buy it! Any way, I thought this is working good, as you could see, what I thought was those Pesky little Pascals, screaming the tops of there little heads off, until I realized the screaming was coming from me. It did do its job, but the folks couldn't get me out of the cow tank, for 2 days! Cows didn't like it either, as it left an Oil Slick!



A Pascal Survivor. Herm.
I guess I got a bad case of the pascals from hangin' with the fluid dynamics guys at IIT. They had a nasty habit of trying new things and arithmeticking it all to death. Cogitators, the whole lot of them. Disgusting, yet contagious..
MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2012, 11:17 AM   #2
Rex_A_Lott
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Upstate South Carolina
Posts: 794
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

I dont really have anything constructive to add here, just wanted to bump it back to the top, because I've been reading here and asking myself this same question for a few months now.
Rex_A_Lott is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 02-09-2012, 01:21 PM   #3
msmaron
Senior Member
 
msmaron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wauconda, IL
Posts: 3,604
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

It has been very informative, but typical of these posts it went WAY WAY off my topic, Thanks to all that chimed in, Mike and Herm, loved your posts the way you went at each other and thanks to all. i will be changing the head gasket this weekend and will post follow up photos...
Mark
__________________
A7191-Sport Coupe
29 Roadster
29-Town Sedan
29-Original Special Coupe
msmaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2012, 05:28 PM   #4
1931 flamingo
Senior Member
 
1931 flamingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: new britain,ct 06052
Posts: 9,428
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

To "stir" it up some more. Which head gasket are you using??
Paul in CT
1931 flamingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2012, 06:38 PM   #5
Tom Wesenberg
Senior Member
 
Tom Wesenberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 27,582
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

It was the copper gasket.
Tom Wesenberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 12:12 AM   #6
PC/SR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 1,285
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
sphanna: The circumferential groove channels the oil around the center or the bearing, not across. Without pressure, the oil is not going to spread far across the bearing. I even have some doubt as to how effective pressure on a Model A rod would be because the oil spurt hole in the top of the big end would not allow much pressure build up.
The A rod had X grooves across the rod cap and across the big end, with the X intersecting at the dipper hole. There is also a short "scooped out" groove at the dipper hole. Thus the oil would be direct to the center of the rod, as well as across it. There was also a V shaped relief at the parting line.
The A mains originally had a spiral groove across the caps and the block side that crossed through the oil hole from the valve chamber. These grooves carried the oil across the main bearings, not around them.
Looks like I got the pics up, thanks Tom. 1. Rod cap. you can see a part of the X in the rod big end. 2 rear main cap. 3 center and front main cap 4. center main block. The rear main block also has a groove through the gravity feed hole that goes across the bearing. Sorry no good pic. Pat
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0823.jpg (43.3 KB, 41 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0793.jpg (56.0 KB, 110 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0794.jpg (59.2 KB, 39 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0709.jpg (34.7 KB, 42 views)

Last edited by PC/SR; 02-10-2012 at 12:31 AM.
PC/SR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 12:26 PM   #7
James Rogers
Senior Member
 
James Rogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Asheville,NC
Posts: 3,104
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

Excellent dissertation and, all correct.
James Rogers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 01:06 PM   #8
Gord. B by the bay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Owen Sound Ont. Canada
Posts: 198
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

Very helpfull Mike many thanks for sharing Gord. B by the bay
Gord. B by the bay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 05:03 PM   #9
Kohnke Rebabbitting
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: 60615,330th Ave.,Clare, Iowa, 50524
Posts: 1,457
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

Well Mike, I have 3500.00 dollars of babbitt in the tinning pot, and 6000.00 dollars in the Pouring pot, and the only Gas around the the pots for 44 years, has come from the L.P. tank, and Me!

So with out a bad bearing in 44 years, with at least 30,000 spun poured, just in Model A Ford rods, not counting all other cars, tractors Ect., I just for the life of me, can't figure out what I am doing wrong?

Of the bearings that have been changed over to inserts in the last 10 years, have now had there bearing inserts that they used Obsoleted completely, or in certain sizes. Say the insert you used is no longer available, then what, happens every day, companies go broke, People Die, Not enough call for an insert Ect. May be the cranks wore .002, and still round, and no bigger sizes, then what? Nothing is made for ever!

Race cars never had trouble with babbitt bearings, or any of the other cars. The only time for bearing trouble, is when the engines got wore out or mistreated, and I don't think your inserts would act any different, may be not even as good!

My first questions to anyone with a babbitt pot are what alloy, how do you degas it, and what do you use as a grain refiner prior to pour, and how long do you hold it after the final degas and grain refinement? The answer to the last few Q's is inevitably "Huh?". That's why I will always use inserts and NEVER have anyone who does model A work do a babbitt job for anything I own. If you want to hear "Huh?" again, ask what their protocol is to degas, pig, and de-skull the melting pot between runs, and at what time interval?

As far as I am concerned, "Huh" is an Appropriate answer! You may have to do what you are suggesting in a foundry setting, with Aluminum Ect. But the way I look at is, in something doesn't work, then you have to Question WHY?
But How Do you fix something that works?



My first questions to anyone with a babbitt pot are what alloy, how do you degas it, and what do you use as a grain refiner prior to pour, and how long do you hold it after the final degas and grain refinement? The answer to the last few Q's is inevitably "Huh?". That's why I will always use inserts and NEVER have anyone who does model A work do a babbitt job for anything I own. If you want to hear "Huh?" again, ask what their protocol is to degas, pig, and de-skull the melting pot between runs, and at what time interval?


No Where, In any book, or artical on rebabbitting, have I every read anything to do with what you are talking about in the level of babbitt, past the ore stage. SO, I said to my self, "Hay Self" Why don't you call the the foundrys that put the mix togather, so I did, I read them your paragraph, and asked them if it is something to look into, you will never guess what the first guy said, well maybe you did, he said "Huh? So according to the first guy, and they are mixing it, it is nothing I would have to be concerned about, as what I work with, is way after the stage you are talking about, as the babbitt is already refined. And as far as holes in the babbitt, and wrinkles, Ect. That is corected by the Babbitter. With all this said, there is no two bearings, and or Jigs the will pour alike, Heavy bearings, Thin bearings, Leakey bearings Ect. The only secret that I know of Hidden in a good bearing, is all Temps, Time, and Heat retention. And you have to know what to do to correct it.

I do feel sorry for James, agreeing with Mike, as he now knows you can't pour a Model A Block like he has been doing, and coming to terms with all the machinery, and testing equipment he will have to put in to do a Model A block right, unless he has it?



That's why I will always use inserts and NEVER have anyone who does model A work do a babbitt job for anything I own.



Thats about what I thought Mike, You know all about pouring babbitt, but can't do it your self, thats all right, you arn't the only one on here like that.



But, I still feel sorry for James.

Last edited by Kohnke Rebabbitting; 02-10-2012 at 06:58 PM.
Kohnke Rebabbitting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 05:36 PM   #10
BRENT in 10-uh-C
Senior Member
 
BRENT in 10-uh-C's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Eastern Tennessee
Posts: 11,972
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kohnke Rebabbitting View Post


But, I still feel sorry for James.
Herm, what you trying to imply?

.
__________________
.

BRENT in 10-uh-C
.
www.model-a-ford.com
...(...Finally Updated!! )

.
BRENT in 10-uh-C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 06:06 PM   #11
Kohnke Rebabbitting
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: 60615,330th Ave.,Clare, Iowa, 50524
Posts: 1,457
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRENT in 10-uh-C View Post
Herm, what you trying to imply?

.
I am not implying any thing, did you for get how to comprehend? Read the Post!

Last edited by Kohnke Rebabbitting; 02-10-2012 at 06:12 PM.
Kohnke Rebabbitting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 07:13 PM   #12
hardtimes
Senior Member
 
hardtimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South California
Posts: 6,190
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

Wow, you guys are thought provoking, informative and entertaining! Made me run (well hobble) right out to examine block/rods/stuff in the shed to check on your info and learn further!
Herm, Mike, PC and others...thanks for the instruction and entertainment (hmm, pascal ? must be insider stuff.

Last edited by hardtimes; 02-10-2012 at 07:16 PM. Reason: add..
hardtimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 09:56 PM   #13
MikeK
Senior Member
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Windy City
Posts: 2,919
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kohnke Rebabbitting View Post

Well Mike, . . . and the only Gas around the the pots for 44 years, has come from the L.P. tank, and Me!


You sure let a lot of it go in this thread!
I'm done here in this thread too. Moving on.
MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 10:16 PM   #14
Kohnke Rebabbitting
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: 60615,330th Ave.,Clare, Iowa, 50524
Posts: 1,457
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeK View Post


You sure let a lot of it go in this thread!
I'm done here in this thread too. Moving on.


Mike, It sounds like the pot calling the kettle black, You being from the Windy City, and all!
Kohnke Rebabbitting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 06:00 PM   #15
Kohnke Rebabbitting
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: 60615,330th Ave.,Clare, Iowa, 50524
Posts: 1,457
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??



Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,834

The answer to the last few Q's is inevitably "Huh?". That's why I will always use inserts and NEVER have anyone who does model A work do a babbitt job for anything I own. If you want to hear "Huh?" again, ask what their protocol is to degas, pig, and de-skull the melting pot between runs, and at what time interval?



Re: Engine rebuild cost
$2000- $5000 Check with www.schwalms.com Schwalm's/Ora Landis (Babbitted Bearings)(Pennsylvania)


Sounds like a contradiction in terms, or ideas to me Mike! Or Schwalms meets all your babbitt processing ideas. Maybe you could ask them to show us all the steps you have to take, to show how we should be doing it, or unless it a secret. I know I am an Inquiring Mind!
Kohnke Rebabbitting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 07:53 PM   #16
James Rogers
Senior Member
 
James Rogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Asheville,NC
Posts: 3,104
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

I don't see any implication, Herm thinks me an IDIOT. This has become very obvious in the last months so I just don't reply to any of his posts no matter what. I guess I just don't know what I am doing according to the GOD OF BABBITT.

Last I have to say!
James Rogers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 09:24 PM   #17
Kohnke Rebabbitting
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: 60615,330th Ave.,Clare, Iowa, 50524
Posts: 1,457
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

I do feel sorry for James, agreeing with Mike, as he now knows you can't pour a Model A Block like he has been doing, and coming to terms with all the machinery, and testing equipment he will have to put in to do a Model A block right, unless he has it?

Well, this is for your acting Mommy "Brent", read this one over, and over, or just wait until morning, when the "Bud" is worn off!



Quote:
Originally Posted by James Rogers View Post
I don't see any implication, Herm thinks me an IDIOT. This has become very obvious in the last months so I just don't reply to any of his posts no matter what. I guess I just don't know what I am doing according to the GOD OF BABBITT.

Last I have to say!
No place that I know of that I have called you an "Idiot" but when I, don't agree with any statement, idea, supposed fact from anybody, you will here a different opinion, and as many times as I have to say it. If I am wrong, SHOW ME. If you want me to agree with you, start saying things I agree with!

Oh, and James, my title in not "God of Babbitt" it is Babbitt God. You only use God of Babbitt when you are an Apprentice!

It is just like the Guy who had a job baiting hooks with fish parts, for rich people, down at the Wharf. He worked 2 years for his boss as an Apprentice Baiter, then one day after 2 years, his Boss gave him his Diploma, showing that he had graduated to being a Master.......
Kohnke Rebabbitting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2012, 10:27 AM   #18
1931 flamingo
Senior Member
 
1931 flamingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: new britain,ct 06052
Posts: 9,428
Default Re: To Babbit or Not To Babbit vs Inserted??

FEEL THE LOVE...................

Paul in CT
1931 flamingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 PM.