|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 12
|
![]()
What is the best way to convert a 1936 Ford to hydraulic brakes ?
Which part shuld I use for a good result ? //Mike |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: SoCal-Redlands
Posts: 3,413
|
![]()
__________________
Making the simple complicated for over 30 years. |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Land of the Midnight Sun
Posts: 182
|
![]()
Using 1939 pedals and master cylinder is a traditional way to convert 1935-38 mechanical brakes to a hydraulic brake system. Here's an older thread with much information for installing the '39 pedals in a '36 frame:
https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showt...ht=1939+pedals |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 4,420
|
![]()
[QUOTE=BlueNotes;2314265]Using 1939 pedals and master cylinder is a traditional way to convert 1935-38 mechanical brakes to a hydraulic brake system. Here's an older thread with much information for installing the '39 pedals in a '36 frame:
Involves a lot of frame cutting. If I had to do over I'd use 36 pedals and parts from http://www.earlyv8garage.net/
__________________
41 woodie https://41fordwoodie.weebly.com/ Last edited by mrtexas; 05-28-2024 at 12:05 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Land of the Midnight Sun
Posts: 182
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 11,633
|
![]() Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesota, Florida Keys
Posts: 11,633
|
![]()
I believe the O/P would be well served by spending some time reviewing the myriad of posts on this subject on the forum. It would serve him well to at least understand the difference between Bendix and Lockheed brakes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Shore of LAKE HOUSTON
Posts: 11,184
|
![]() Quote:
In the link BELOW is a short description of the two basic types of brakes that I wrote-up some time back. It does help to understand their individual working theories. The "Bendix" (synonymous with 'SELF-ENERGIZING') most definitely far superior to the Lockheeds. Coop https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showp...35&postcount=1 . |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: upstate SC
Posts: 3,000
|
![]()
I have installed floaters in about a dozen cars/trucks from 1929, 34, 36, 38. I will tell you they work as good or better than the hydraulic conversions with out the floating fronf shoes such as 48 up ford pick ups.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,025
|
![]()
Be aware you will also need to change your front hub/drums to '37-'39 parts if you are going to retain your wide 5 wheels. Your '36 rear drums will work.
As the previous poster stated you can make probably make the mechanical brakes work as good as Lockheed juice brakes. If you are set on hyd brakes it would be a good idea to use self-energizing repop Lincoln brakes on at least the front. '39 pedals work;but V8 Garage's kit turns that end of it into a bolt-on option. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Land of the Midnight Sun
Posts: 182
|
![]()
This is the Early V8 Garage 1935-35 hydraulic brake conversion kit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,816
|
![]()
Stock 1936 spindles, hubs and drums are one year only are they not?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Land of the Midnight Sun
Posts: 182
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 10,148
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 5,170
|
![]()
I've sold several brake conversions for 35-40 Fords using the Boling Bros Lincoln brakes. Work great.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 522
|
![]()
Stock 37-39 wide 5 drums work with Lincoln backing plates, a slight bit of relief must be ground on the top of 36 spindle. I used Lincoln/Bendix brakes on the front and 39 Ford/Lockheed on the rear of my 36 coupe. Initially I had the EV8 Garage hydraulic brake setup style #1 on my car, but when I went to a T170 RTS 4speed trans, it wouldn't work due to the elimination of the K member mounted pedal pivots utilized in that kit. Style#2 also interfered with the trans install so I am running a Drake repop 39 pedal assembly that required a bit of cutting in the K member to make it fit. It does relocate the pedals a bit from stock, but not noticeable. All that being said, I have a slightly used EV8 Garage style #1 bolt in hydraulic kit that is missing the Ebrake portion (I'm still using that part) for sale if anyone is interested. Lacy sells the Ebrake portion separately, but it is just a slightly bent S shape tube with an attachment tab welded to one end to anchor it. It guides the cable back to the pull yoke. Easy fab
PM me if you are interested in the barely used Style #1 kit I have. It bolts directly to the holes in the K member just behind the center section and rides under the Torque tube. No alteration of any stock assemblies at all. Nicely engineered. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements) |
|