Quote:
Originally Posted by willowbilly3
I do somewhat understand Ford's numbering system. "Numbers matching" was once a term only used by the GM people, where it means something completely different.
On GM you could tell if major components were the one's a car left the factory with. On a Ford you can only tell if the part number and date code are consistent with ones built within a time frame the car would have been manufactured in. So a diligent restorer of a Ford can install a different part and still have it be consistent with the numbering system. On a GM, that's not possible. So even though the term has crept out of the GM camp and over to ours, it isn't the same thing. To the best of my understanding.
|
OK... Some
BOW-TIE NUT is going to have to explain to me their version of
numbers matching.
All manufacturers had to stamp VEHICLE VIN NOS (partial) on 68 up cars (engine-trans) as a means to thwart chop shops and that would give true meaning of NUMBERS CORRECT as I see it.
GM could not have stamped the VIN on every assembly part, other than an ID casting no. system similar to FOMOCO.
ATTACHED MAGAZINE ARTICLE-
https://www.newsday.com/classifieds/...sals-1.6154213
__________________
*****
- MULTI-VEHICLE SYNTHETIC TRANSMISSION FLUID -
Multi-vehicle transmission fluids are becoming more and more popular in the marketplace. Oil marketers design these fluids for a wide range of automatic transmission types. While they are not licensed by any specific auto manufacturer ... ??? ... enough said ...
DIAGNOSED CDO - (OCD In Correct Alphabetical Order)