The Ford Barn

The Ford Barn (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/index.php)
-   Early V8 (1932-53) (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   48 F-1 running board configuration (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?t=221189)

DD931 05-21-2017 02:15 PM

48 F-1 running board configuration
 

I have an early '48 F-1. I have taken the running boards off for refurbishment and find that they are noticeably different that the ones being sold as replacements by the usual reliable vendors (Drake, Carpenter, etc.). Mine are attached to the two underlying brackets, the fenders on each end and then have a long flat extension that goes over to and is bolted to the side of the frame. The repos don't have any attachment to the frame and stop at the edge of the body but are not connected. Would some of you F-1 folks go take a look, please? I'm trying to figure out if Henry made a change, or are the repo folks just using less steel? Mine seem stronger!! Comments welcome!!

alanwoodieman 05-21-2017 02:20 PM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

can you post a picture? I may have a set like them that I acquired with a bunch of other parts--will post a picture today

alanwoodieman 05-21-2017 02:40 PM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

2 Attachment(s)
quit raining and I got a couple of pictures showing differences in running boards I was going to cut off the "extra" part as the rest of the board is restorable. I do have a pair

FortyNiner 05-21-2017 03:00 PM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

Yes, there is a difference between the originals and repops. I'm unclear if the design change originated at the factory. Considering how faithfully Carpenter recreates parts, I'll trust that Henry II made the change.

If the braces are fitted correctly, there shouldn't be any issue with functionality.

DD931 05-21-2017 03:33 PM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

4 Attachment(s)
OK - here are some pics. This is the passenger side. Woodie - Do both of yours have the side "extension"? Sorry the pics aren't better!!

Ken Crans 05-21-2017 04:15 PM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

I like those boards better than repops... If they are restorable,use them.

49r 05-22-2017 03:35 AM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

My New Zealand (Canadian built but assembled in NZ) '49 F1 running boards have the 'long flat extension'. My running boards aren't in good shape so 20 years ago I purchased some NOS USA ones from a NZ vendor which don't have the extension - identical to the repro ones today. Perhaps then both sorts were original manufacture at some point.
Haven't got around to fitting them yet, but when I do will add the extensions to keep things original to my pickup.

GreenMonster48 05-22-2017 01:21 PM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

I had those boards on my 48, but unfortunately non-salvageable. My guess is that the change was made in late 50 or '51 to accommodate for the US Gov's steel needs during the Korean Conflict. Total speculation here though.

FortyNiner 05-22-2017 02:53 PM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

Not sure of the driver for the change, I would also expect that cost came into play. During that same 1950 model year, the bed sides became straight (from the original embossed style) and the beds shifted from steel to wood.

alanwoodieman 05-22-2017 09:26 PM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

since I have earlier trucks (40/41) I believe that they were made more like those boards, then they (Ford) discovered that they did not need the extra bracing that the wide upper part afforded and being as NO mfg. uses more than necessary they excluded that part. My 48 late production does not even have the frame holes for them

Ross F-1 05-22-2017 10:03 PM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

I don't see what purpose the extra depth provided?

I didn't think they bolted to the frame?

DD931 05-23-2017 08:44 AM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

Yes, they bolt to the frame!! With very rusty frozen bolts, by the way!!

gearhead1952 05-24-2017 03:58 PM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

Yes the boards with extra are from trucks 48-50. Have not seen them on the 51-52 trucks I have had.

DD931 05-24-2017 07:32 PM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

Looking closer, I see that the bottoms of the front fenders can be pulled away from the body of the cab without the running boards installed. That would argue in favor of having them bolted over to the frame!! Perhaps there are additional bolts holding the fenders with the "newer" configuration.

Barry-ct 05-25-2017 07:16 AM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

Ford lists the boards under the same part number as 7C 16450-F and 7C 16451-F for 48-52. Yet I have only seen the wide boards on 48-50. My parts book is the 48-54 edition.

alanwoodieman 05-25-2017 07:21 AM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

there is a spacer of sorts between the front fender/frame/running board on my truck, is there one on the earlier boards?

DD931 05-25-2017 01:13 PM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

I don't see anything like that on mine.

FortyNiner 05-25-2017 01:52 PM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanwoodieman (Post 1477228)
there is a spacer of sorts between the front fender/frame/running board on my truck, is there one on the earlier boards?

Are you talking about a rubber piece?

alanwoodieman 05-25-2017 01:58 PM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

not a rubber piece but a piece of sheetmetal.

Ross F-1 05-25-2017 03:44 PM

Re: 48 F-1 running board configuration
 

1 Attachment(s)
All years have that piece, it closes off the running board upper surface from the undercarriage and splash from the wheels. (Hard to see because it's all black)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.