![]() |
Master cylinder conversion Guys-
I am in the process of converting a '36 to hydraulic brakes. I have been using floaters on the brakes for some time but it seems like they have a constant demand for being adjusted which is no long "fun." While searching the archives I came across an excellent response to a question that "Mart" made in regards to a dual chamber m/c set-up: "If a supplier were to arrange a 1-1/16" dual cylinder with built in residual valves, nice easy to access reservoir and a three bolt fixing like the original, then kit it out with outlets so a 1/4 pipe would screw straight in, plus a port for the brake light switch then they would sell like hot cakes to the early ford squad." (7-28-14) Anyone ever find something close or possibly a "workable" 1-1/16" m/c like Mart suggested? Thanks Tom |
Re: Master cylinder conversion I'm not sure you can find a dual MC with the 1 1/16 bore. They do make an adapter that goes from 3 bolt to 2 bolt for the 39 pedal assemble ,so you can use the dual MC. It moves the MC back about 3/4". There are adapters that will screw into the MC that will allow the 1/4" lines. Some dual cylinders have residual valves and some do not. It would take some research and a parts house with some knowledgeable people willing to help to find a cylinder with the correct specifications to use with the adapter.
|
Re: Master cylinder conversion Hi all; I ran across a old Ford with a dual master cyl and the big 5/16' tubing ports. It was a drum/drum early '60s Cadillac. We found a new/ rebuilt one in the NAPA catalog, and it all worked great. Newc
|
Re: Master cylinder conversion Newc - like this one? 1962-66 Cadillac Master Cylinder
http://www.rockauto.com/catalog/more...564&cc=1320297 https://www.opgi.com/cadillac/CE10703/ http://www.summitracing.com/parts/dh.../make/cadillac |
Re: Master cylinder conversion Tom,
I recently went through this. The only 1 1/16" mc I found was from Wilwood. Unfortunately, it just didn't move enough fluid to work correctly and I ended up using a 1 1/8" one from Summit. When I say 'correctly', I spent a lot of time studying how a mc works and what is SUPPOSED to happen if one circuit fails. So, while the 1 1/6" mc worked OK under normal circumstances, it would NOT work in the event of a failure of either front or rear brakes. There was just not enough pedal travel in my '36. IMO, I think the 1 1/8" one works great. The pedal effort/travel is fine for me. But Mart is correct. Plumbing is a nightmare all to itself. I spent a lot of time on the Net and at the local parts houses trying to get all the fittings I needed. It was not fun. Heard |
Re: Master cylinder conversion Drum/drum Mustang works for me. It's not an easy 10 second swap, and requires some adapters for the 1/4" lines, but it works very well.
|
Re: Master cylinder conversion Quote:
So when you get it all built ie " smaller MC. adapter plate, and pluming fittings made " please send all info with drawings in detail, and all parts numbers..ect...... thanks ..........OLD...........BILL:cool: |
Re: Master cylinder conversion Plus 1 for Mustang MC. Drum Drum and built in residual pressure valves.
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/DH...n/?prefilter=1 |
Re: Master cylinder conversion John-
Thanks for the reply. Looking over the Summit web site you referred to brings up a question. The ports appear to be on what would be the inboard side. Is there a model that has the posts on the other side? If not, how did you hook-up the brake tubing? In my situation the brake lines will be on the outboard side (frame side) of the car. Again, thanks for the quick reply. Tom |
Re: Master cylinder conversion I used the Mustang Drum Drum on 2 of my projects, my 30Model coupe and my dragster, just make sure the leverage linkage that moves the rod to MC is short, If you have to long a linkage you'll have to push the pedal harder. Walt
|
Re: Master cylinder conversion 2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
(not my car, just some random pictures) |
Re: Master cylinder conversion Use a 1967 Mustang cyl. drum drum.
|
Re: Master cylinder conversion That's what I use, the 67 Mustang. Need to watch, they come both drum/drum and disc/drum.
|
Re: Master cylinder conversion Quote:
|
Re: Master cylinder conversion Quote:
Using tape or sealant on brake lines is a big No, No. The flare should do the sealing and if it doesn't then it needs to be corrected. Again, Good catch V8 Bob. |
Re: Master cylinder conversion Tom, I don't think they make Mustang cylinders with ports on oposite side. You can route to other side as mentioned. Also the front brakes are connected to the port nearest the pushrod. The ports have different sizes. I went to autozone and got inverted flare fittings to fit each hole for 1/4 inch line.
I used MT Car Bendix brakes on the front and Ford brakes on the rear. |
Re: Master cylinder conversion 10-1373 is a 1" bore drum/drum master similar to the Mustang; but with the ports on the opposite side.
Should use 1/4" lines too; not the 3/16" lines that are in the picture. |
Re: Master cylinder conversion Quote:
|
Re: Master cylinder conversion Good info rich! The only thing to possibly be careful of with a 1" bore in this case is the fact that it's going to require a longer pedal stroke to displace an equal volume of fluid as that displaced by a 1-1/16" bore, especially if one side of the cylinder ever fails. That can be a problem with the pedal geometry in these old Fords. Just sayin'! DD
|
Re: Master cylinder conversion I just helped a friend change out the brakes and master cylinder on his 45 pickup. He now has F-100 brakes all around. We used a 1" bore dual cylinder. I hope it will work. He is installing the fronts today.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.