The Ford Barn

The Ford Barn (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/index.php)
-   Early V8 (1932-53) (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse (https://www.fordbarn.com/forum/showthread.php?t=224743)

Vintage Copper 47 07-15-2017 03:47 PM

6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

I've gone through all the posts about tubeless radial tires.. I currently have Coker bias-ply 6.00x16 tires and I am planning to switch to a tubeless radial. I know Diamondback makes the auburn in 6.00x16R My question; will 6.50x16 or its equivalent (185/75R16 - hard to find)... I don't care if they look like bias-ply.. Will the 6.50x16 fit my 47 Fordor sedan? or will I have rubbing issues in the fenderwell?

alanwoodieman 07-15-2017 03:54 PM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

you are correct, the horse is dead

Vintage Copper 47 07-15-2017 04:56 PM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

So my question is to 42-48 sedan owners... Will 6.50 x 16 tires rub in the fenderwells?
:eek:

mrtexas 07-15-2017 05:43 PM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

6.50 x 16 fit my 36 woodie

ford38v8 07-15-2017 05:48 PM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrtexas (Post 1499719)
6.50 x 16 fit my 36 woodie

You didn't understand the question?

Vintage Copper 47 07-15-2017 05:59 PM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrtexas (Post 1499719)
6.50 x 16 fit my 36 woodie

Are the fender clearances for your 36 woodie the same as a 42-48 sedan?

SofaKing 07-15-2017 06:18 PM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

Why not use a tape measure with the OD and width of the tire you want and compare it to the tire you have and see if it fits? If its close enough you are not sure it will fit, that's too close.

Jack E/NJ 07-15-2017 07:05 PM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

If you can't get a definitive answer, you might consider doing what I did on an OT bias era classic. Drove it to an agreeable local shop to mount & test just one radial that they *guessed* might work. It was OK in the rear, but rubbed frame-side front on full turns. Tried the next width down, better but still rubbed a bit. The shop only charged for six dismounts & mounts at $7 a pop. I gave them a 20% tip. I eventually ended up buying spacers from Amazon and the wider radials from the local shop cuz the outside clearance wasn't an issue. Jack E/NJ

Vintage Copper 47 07-15-2017 07:47 PM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack E/NJ (Post 1499774)
If you can't get a definitive answer, you might consider doing what I did on an OT bias era classic. Drove it to an agreeable local shop to mount & test just one radial that they *guessed* might work. It was OK in the rear, but rubbed frame-side front on full turns. Tried the next width down, better but still rubbed a bit. The shop only charged for six dismounts & mounts at $7 a pop. I gave them a 20% tip. I eventually ended up buying spacers from Amazon and the wider radials from the local shop cuz the outside clearance wasn't an issue. Jack E/NJ

I will just stick with the 6.00x16's.. Just thought maybe someone with same car has done this..

deuce lover 07-16-2017 04:49 AM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

A buddy of mine has a 41 woody with 600 X 16 Diamond Back(Dunlop) radial WW and no problems(fender clearance) whatsoever.

Vintage Copper 47 07-16-2017 03:03 PM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by deuce lover (Post 1499937)
A buddy of mine has a 41 woody with 600 X 16 Diamond Back(Dunlop) radial WW and no problems(fender clearance) whatsoever.

6.00 x 16 is stock

I was wondering about 6.50 x 16

alanwoodieman 07-16-2017 03:26 PM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

6:50 x x16 was offered by Ford in the era as an extra

Vintage Copper 47 07-16-2017 04:02 PM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanwoodieman (Post 1500216)
6:50 x x16 was offered by Ford in the era as an extra

Cool...finally a straight answer.. my calculations show the 6.00x16 is approx 28.3 inches in diameter... and the 6.50x16 is about an inch taller.. the width of the 6.50 is about a half an inch wider.. Figure a half inch fore and aft of the wheel well & and a 1/4 inch side to side for steering... so yeah I think they will fit ok..

Vintage Copper 47 07-23-2017 12:40 AM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

1 Attachment(s)
Ok.. after Diamondback wanted to charge me $25 for each tire shipped.. I decided on this go around I would use a modern radial... after doing the tiresize.com comparisons, I settled on a Bridgestone, 195/80R/16... a tubeless radial made only by Bridgestone: the Ecopia EP-02 for Toyota RAV4 electric vehicles.. SAY WHAT?
The size is nearly identical to the 6.00X16 bias ply, both are 28.30 in diameter except the tread width on the Bridgestoneis approx 7.7 inches, whereas the Coker 6.00X16s have a tread width of 6.25.. AND I had no issues with leaks from my 1947 era 16 inch rims...
I have to tell you, the ride is real nice, I had the car up to 72 mph on the freeway and no more bias-ply boogie to deal with... the price was less than $800 for five tires, mounted and balanced... NOT nearly $1300 after shipping and mounting that Diamondback wanted..
https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires...913187&SID=431

qmdv 07-23-2017 08:45 AM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

You are concerned with clearance on 42 to 48 sedans. Isn't a 41 the same as a 42. Are sedans different from coupes and convertibles.

Tim

Floyd 07-23-2017 01:17 PM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

Vintage Copper,
I have those exact tires on my 32 roadster (16" Kelsey wheels) and they are terrific. Look good, efficient rolling, correct size and not costly. Highly recommended!
My opinion

Vintage Copper 47 07-23-2017 01:19 PM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Floyd (Post 1503343)
Vintage Copper,
I have those exact tires on my 32 roadster (16" Kelsey wheels) and they are terrific. Look good, efficient rolling, correct size and not costly. Highly recommended!
My opinion

Yes... it is my hope that more tire manufacturers start making this size to allow for more options..

TJ 07-24-2017 08:29 AM

Re: 6.50X16 Radial Tires - Keep Beating a Dead Horse
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by qmdv (Post 1503245)
You are concerned with clearance on 42 to 48 sedans. Isn't a 41 the same as a 42. Are sedans different from coupes and convertibles.

Tim

The difference on a '41 is the front fenders. They angle inward towards the front and larger tires will rub on the front fenders.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.