Any updates on Tod's new heads Are there any updates on Tod's new heads. I haven't seen any posts lately and I hope everything is going well. I'm hoping to get one of the super crow's foot 7.5 to 1 heads when they are available. Great work by a talented individual and a credit to our hobby.
|
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads PM me for updates or email me. I will be limiting my involvement here due to the jackass factor of some members.
Tod |
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads Quote:
|
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads The great people and the good advise far outweigh the JA's.
|
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads The Grammar, Spelling and Punctuation Police on this forum need to slightly re-work "1929's" posting, or the meaning is entirely different. Note especially the addition of a comma between "ignorant" and "Ted". This is the key change made to avoid a misunderstanding and REALLY send Ted into orbit!. 'Sorry, "1929", but it had to be done. The sentence should read: "Pay no mind to the ignorant, Tod. There are many more here for you than them."
Class dismissed. Marshall |
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads I figured out what "1929" was trying to say, but thank you Marshall for the English lesson.
Many times the grammar and the spelling puzzle me. My mamma was an English teacher in the old days. ken |
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads Thanks, Ken. It took me a couple times reading that sentence to be sure what was actually being said. Nothing personal was, of course, intended towards "1929" in my corrections. We all make typos. I've made some really horrendous ones myself, even though I had proof-read my text before posting it. And English punctuation can sometimes be confusing, especially since the last class in grammar, spelling and punctuation was probably 40-50 years ago for most of us. :) My sole intention was to clarify what I thought "1929" meant without being insulting. We don't need Tod any madder at us than he already is. I'm sure "1929" wasn't calling Tod ignorant, but that's how the original sentence read. No harm, no foul. :)
Marshall |
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads I understood what 1929 was saying. ;) Hope he is not another one to get chased off the barn over his typing. :confused: Thanks Tod for the reply. :)
|
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads Quote:
|
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads Quote:
George |
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads Quote:
|
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads Quote:
Oh well, I'm taking my marbles and going home. Oh, wait. I've lost all my marbles.:D:p |
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads Oh no. Say it aint so. I mean isn't so. Back to school for you Tom. ;)
One "P", or is it pee? :confused: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/apostrophe |
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads Tom, you missed "you're".................. B-
|
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads Dog:cool: here,
Wull, I don't tipe ur spel well & I don't understand whut an APOSTROPHE means:confused::confused:---Hope I don't OFFEND anybody UR git "BANNED":eek: Buster T.:cool: |
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads Huh? Was it me? i didn't say anything.
|
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads |
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads Quote:
YUP, that's the way the IT struck me also....and POT calling KETTLE black ....also comes to mine mind, eh :D:D:D:D:rolleyes: I'd bet that Tod got to grinning at that one also ! |
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads 1 Attachment(s)
...
|
Re: Any updates on Tod's new heads Hi Chuck,
Per your most intelligent and sincere post no. 1, it was noticed that it was only your second post on this Forum ...... and with most heartfelt compassion, I hope you can see through these discussions, that with these fun loving Forum patrons, that you did nothing wrong. Questions like yours, are always the blood-line of any Forum. You are respected by so many, just to submit a question herein. Just felt like I had to let you know this. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.