Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-2011, 06:25 PM   #1
Kirby1374
Senior Member
 
Kirby1374's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coquille, Or
Posts: 280
Default my $175 gamble looks to be a winner

Hey all, many of you have read my postings and have put up with my ignorance. Better yet alot of you have been helping me "get my mind right" about the "Mighty Model A".
Many of you don't know that the engine that I have been working on was in fact an engine I bought of eBay for $175 that was being sold by a classic car lot that had acquired and was now selling a Model A collection from a fella who had passed on.
I cleaned the outside, painted it and put it in my car. I runs "fine" yet not as I felt it should. I deducted it needed a head gasket and upon pulling the head noticed that one there was one valve that looked like it was not replaced when the engine was last gone through (the others looked newer and had a different look to the top). I decide to grind the valves and realized that that "funny" valve was too thin so I robbed one from my other engine.
So, valves ground new headgasket, now on to dropping the pan. I know backwards from what most of you all would have done. Anyway, I think I have a counterweighted crank! This next week I will clearance the bearings and see what will come of it.



Besides the possibly good crank the engine had adjustable tappets.
My only other issue with the engine was an oil leak. Yes they all leak yet mine was not out of the flywheel housing. I learned today that the rear cork pan gasket is bad.
So fingers crossed, I may have gotten a very good motor for $175 (+gas to pick up engine+gaskets)
Kirby1374 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2011, 06:37 PM   #2
pat in Santa Cruz
Senior Member
 
pat in Santa Cruz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: santa cruz, calif
Posts: 2,011
Default Re: my $175 gamble looks to be a winner

hate to disappoint you, but that is a stock crank. It could still be a good engine though.
pat in Santa Cruz is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 02-12-2011, 06:41 PM   #3
Kirby1374
Senior Member
 
Kirby1374's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coquille, Or
Posts: 280
Default Re: my $175 gamble looks to be a winner

Quote:
Originally Posted by pat in Santa Cruz View Post
hate to disappoint you, but that is a stock crank. It could still be a good engine though.
Oh, I didn't know for sure. Looked to me that those were weights. See, I learn something everyday.
Kirby1374 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2011, 07:24 PM   #4
Roadster62
Senior Member
 
Roadster62's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ridgefield, Ct
Posts: 3,442
Default Re: my $175 gamble looks to be a winner

I believe that is the early "Beaver Tail" crank that is lighter than the later ones.
Roadster62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2011, 08:38 PM   #5
Kirby1374
Senior Member
 
Kirby1374's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coquille, Or
Posts: 280
Default Re: my $175 gamble looks to be a winner

Well I might have not posted with such enthusiasm if I would have know it was just a common crank
Kirby1374 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2011, 08:50 PM   #6
Special Coupe Frank
Senior Member
 
Special Coupe Frank's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Northeast Penna
Posts: 2,108
Default Re: my $175 gamble looks to be a winner

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Hey, even if it's "just" a plain stock crank, if you got a decent, runnable engine for $175 and some sweat-equity, you've done alright !

Let us know how it turns-out !

Special Coupe Frank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2011, 09:13 PM   #7
Doug in NJ
Senior Member
 
Doug in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 965
Default Re: my $175 gamble looks to be a winner

BTW, does anyone know why ford made some of the crank throws disc-shaped? It doesn't seem to have any structural purpose, and the discs are in the wrong place to serve as counterweights- they would instead make the balance problem worse.

Doug
__________________
My '31 S/W sedan project:http://31ford.dougbraun.com
My restoration diary: http://dougbraun.com/blog
Doug in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2011, 11:10 AM   #8
Kurt in NJ
Senior Member
 
Kurt in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: on the Littlefield
Posts: 6,163
Default Re: my $175 gamble looks to be a winner

Probably it cost less, and gave the machine an easy place to drill for balance --
Kurt in NJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 PM.