Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Model A (1928-31)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-22-2015, 05:39 PM   #1
GT66PONY
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 48
Default engine no.

How common is it to have the same engine no. as the frame no. ?
It seems odd that my truck would have the original engine after 85 years.
It is a 1929 CCPU
GT66PONY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2015, 06:05 PM   #2
CarlG
Senior Member
 
CarlG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 9,115
Default Re: engine no.

When I bought my '31 CCPU, I was told it had matching numbers. Turns out that the engine was a diamond block restamp. Numbers did match the title though.
__________________
Alaskan A's
Antique Auto Mushers of Alaska
Model A Ford Club of America
Model A Restorers Club
Antique Automobile Club of America
Mullins Owner's Club
CarlG is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 04-22-2015, 06:49 PM   #3
ronn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NNNNNNNNJJJJJJJJJJ
Posts: 6,787
Default Re: engine no.

I would guess about 50/50 with all A's

however when talking about an A truck, bet the percentages go further down-trucks were used and abused...................
ronn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2015, 07:20 PM   #4
Barry B./ Ma.
Senior Member
 
Barry B./ Ma.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southbridge, Ma.
Posts: 1,614
Default Re: engine no.

My coupe had matching numbers when I bought it in 1981, I didn't think much about it at the time so after a couple of years had another spare engine rebuilt for it as I wanted to keep driving while the replacement was rebuilt. Lord only knows where the original engine ended up.
Barry B./ Ma. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2015, 08:03 PM   #5
brito36
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Marengo. Illinois
Posts: 262
Default Re: engine no.

I have owned a dozen Model A's since I was a teenager. All but two of them had matching frame and motor numbers.
brito36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2015, 08:09 PM   #6
Fred K-OR
Senior Member
 
Fred K-OR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Stayton, Oregon
Posts: 3,806
Default Re: engine no.

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
My 1929 huckster in it's prior life as a CCPU, has matching numbers. The prior life was when I was a teen back in the 1950's and I destroyed it then as a pickup and all these years I kept the "Junk" which I made into a huckster in 2009. I was surprised when I found the numbers matched.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 01aUntitled-Scanned-10.jpg (66.5 KB, 37 views)
__________________
Fred Kroon
1929 Std Coupe
1929 Huckster
Fred K-OR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2015, 02:59 PM   #7
GT66PONY
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 48
Default Re: engine no.

That is crazy !! 85 years and the same motor!! How many of todays cars will last 85 years???
GT66PONY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2015, 03:22 PM   #8
Barry B./ Ma.
Senior Member
 
Barry B./ Ma.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southbridge, Ma.
Posts: 1,614
Default Re: engine no.

How about NONE, GT66PONY!

Last edited by Barry B./ Ma.; 04-23-2015 at 04:56 PM.
Barry B./ Ma. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2015, 03:54 PM   #9
brito36
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Marengo. Illinois
Posts: 262
Default Re: engine no.

Cars of today are too expensive, over rated, high tech, and disposable. The costs of repairs are just too prohibitive ($2500.00 for a transmission), and you end just junking them. None of these modern marvels will be around thirty years from now.......
brito36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2015, 04:09 PM   #10
ian Simpson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 709
Default Re: engine no.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brito36 View Post
Cars of today are too expensive, over rated, high tech, and disposable. The costs of repairs are just too prohibitive ($2500.00 for a transmission), and you end just junking them. None of these modern marvels will be around thirty years from now.......
I just sold an over-rated high tech and disposable 2000 Dodge Durango. It only had 400,000 miles on it and a little rust on the front bumper. As for prohibitively expensive repairs; it had the wiper motor and the ignition switch replaced. Other than consumables like tyres, brake pads and wiper blades; that was it. No oil needed to be added between changes and there were no leaks.

Why did we sell it? We have more grandkids than seats in a five seater.

Bought another minivan. Sure do miss the Durango. I am sure it would last another 70 years.

All that being said, the 1928 Tudor is much more fun.

Ian
ian Simpson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2015, 04:35 PM   #11
CarlG
Senior Member
 
CarlG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 9,115
Default Re: engine no.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brito36 View Post
Cars of today are too expensive, over rated, high tech, and disposable. The costs of repairs are just too prohibitive ($2500.00 for a transmission), and you end just junking them. None of these modern marvels will be around thirty years from now.......
How about:
$1,000 to fix the gas gauge, or
$900 to fix the heater, or
$1,000 -- replace the throttle body (whatever that is)

(2004 Explorer, V6, 98K miles)

Makes some of the major things I've had to do to my Model A look really cheap in comparison.
__________________
Alaskan A's
Antique Auto Mushers of Alaska
Model A Ford Club of America
Model A Restorers Club
Antique Automobile Club of America
Mullins Owner's Club
CarlG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2015, 05:07 PM   #12
mshmodela
Senior Member
 
mshmodela's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,763
Default Re: engine no.

My late 31' has a May 30' Engine.. So far running well.
__________________
-Mike

Late 31' Ford Model A Tudor, Miss Daisy

I don't work on cars --I'm learning about my Model A.

Cleveland, Ohio
mshmodela is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2015, 07:42 PM   #13
GT66PONY
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 48
Default Re: engine no.

My mustang will be 50 next year on the same 289
GT66PONY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2015, 09:36 AM   #14
Bruce Lancaster
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 5,230
Default Re: engine no.

When you see matching numbers...look at the engine pad and see it it has been machined smooth and restamped. I'd bet a large percentage of matching cars are restamps.
From earliest times up int the sixties, rebuilt Model A engines were avaiable everywhere, including Sears and Wards, and were a cheap and quick way to get the heap moving. I think this was the main reason for non-matching cars...having Joe's garage rebuild your engine cost more and took a lot longer than putting in a rebuilt.
Bruce Lancaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2015, 10:25 AM   #15
rocket1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Midland Park,N.J.
Posts: 1,108
Default Re: engine no.

My 29ccpu has matching numbers,how would one know if the replacement motor was restamped?
rocket1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2015, 10:55 AM   #16
Bruce Lancaster
Member Emeritus
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 5,230
Default Re: engine no.

The pad where serial is stamped was left as cast at the factory, and background will have the same cast texture as the rest of the block. A restamp would generally have a milled finish from having original # milled off. I'm sure there are also more subtle restamps out there...probably some restorers have figured out a way to come out with a new number and the texture!
Man rebuilders past and present routinely cut away serials on the engines processed.
Bruce Lancaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2015, 04:26 PM   #17
Tom Wesenberg
Senior Member
 
Tom Wesenberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 27,582
Default Re: engine no.

Here's an original engine number.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Engine number original2.jpg (80.9 KB, 42 views)
Tom Wesenberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.