Go Back   The Ford Barn > General Discussion > Late V8 (1954+)

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2017, 05:31 PM   #1
SuperDave
Senior Member
 
SuperDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne Fl
Posts: 166
Default 59 1/2 ton PU

I have a friend that owns a nice 59 PU with a six cylinder engine. He wants to "hot rod" it with dual exhaust and twin carbs. What is the engine? 240 ? What is available for these? My experience is with Model A's and Stepdown Hudsons. I will probably be doing all the work! LOL..
SuperDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2017, 05:56 PM   #2
Dobie Gillis
Senior Member
 
Dobie Gillis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 1,060
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

It's a 223 unless somebody swapped in a later, bigger 6. A 300 6 would be the ticket for it. They're practically immortal and have gobs of torque. Check out Clifford Engineering for inline 6 go fast parts.
Dobie Gillis is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
Old 02-07-2017, 06:23 PM   #3
SuperDave
Senior Member
 
SuperDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne Fl
Posts: 166
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

Jack Clifford started out years ago by making Hudsons go faster! I'll will check them out.
Thanks, Dave
SuperDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2017, 10:50 PM   #4
40 Deluxe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: now Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 3,779
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

If you want to keep the original look, find a 262 cu. in. six from a f-600 or so truck from the same era. Looks just like to 223 but bunches more power. A plus: You can't beat the sound of a straight six with a split exhaust manifold or headers!
40 Deluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2017, 11:22 PM   #5
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

If you want to rod it... find a good 292 y-block for it (or a phantom 312!!), itll drop right in. Love the y-block!

The six is a bulletproof motor, but never a "hotrod motor".

If you want to hop a 6. check out 6=8

http://www.cliffordperformance.net/6...log222222.html

Last edited by Tinker; 02-07-2017 at 11:27 PM.
Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2017, 07:58 AM   #6
SuperDave
Senior Member
 
SuperDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne Fl
Posts: 166
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)
I think the owner wants to keep the original engine, but add some "Bling". Twin carbs and headers would make him happy. "Hot rod" was my attempt at humor! First thing I need to do is determine if the engine IS original. He bought the truck from someone several years ago and has no idea if it's correct or not. I'll consult my stash of "Motors Manuals".
SuperDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2017, 11:28 AM   #7
dmsfrr
Senior Member
 
dmsfrr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Abq, NM
Posts: 3,607
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
I think the owner wants to keep the original engine, but add some "Bling". Twin carbs and headers would make him happy. "Hot rod" was my attempt at humor! First thing I need to do is determine if the engine IS original. He bought the truck from someone several years ago and has no idea if it's correct or not. I'll consult my stash of "Motors Manuals".
Here's a page of some '59 Ford truck specs...
http://www.oldride.com/library/1959_ford_f100.html

Engine block casting number prefix, EBP = 223

Be careful not to add too much carburetor capacity on a stock engine, the day-to-day driveability will likely suffer.
Here's a link to a CFM calculator....
https://www.summitracing.com/experta...cfm-calculator

.

Last edited by dmsfrr; 02-08-2017 at 12:01 PM.
dmsfrr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2017, 01:58 PM   #8
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

I'm pretty sure I still have a set of NOS Hi-lift Barkers somewhere.

Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2017, 02:39 PM   #9
scicala
Senior Member
 
scicala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Detroit suburb, MI
Posts: 3,705
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

Do you mean tall dogs ? What are high lift Barkers ? Rocker arms ?

Sal
scicala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2017, 03:55 PM   #10
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

Hey Sal, I guess the picture didn't show. Yes highlift rocker arms.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg picture.jpg (33.6 KB, 24 views)
Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2017, 08:21 PM   #11
scicala
Senior Member
 
scicala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Detroit suburb, MI
Posts: 3,705
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

Thanks Tinker. I never heard of that brand before. I remember the old Gotha rockers way back when.

Sal
scicala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 04:03 PM   #12
SuperDave
Senior Member
 
SuperDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne Fl
Posts: 166
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

I am hitting a wall. I have written emails to Sacramento Vintage Ford, Patriot headers and Clifford. No response. My basic question is "Why does all the parts advertised for the 223 say Fits up to 1956 ?" I am sure there as some radical change in body style in '57, but why does that impact the 223 engine manifold/header wise?
SuperDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017, 06:13 PM   #13
dmsfrr
Senior Member
 
dmsfrr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Abq, NM
Posts: 3,607
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
I am hitting a wall. I have written emails ..... No response.
Don't email. I suspect most of those Contact Us messages from websites are never seen by a human.
Call them on the phone and ask for 'someone who knows'.

Good luck.

.

Last edited by dmsfrr; 02-18-2017 at 06:47 PM.
dmsfrr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 06:40 AM   #14
SuperDave
Senior Member
 
SuperDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne Fl
Posts: 166
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

Open headers have ruined my hearing! LOL
SuperDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 01:03 PM   #15
blucar
Senior Member
 
blucar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 2,464
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

The 223 six of the mid to late fifty's were not very good engines, had several of them in work trucks. Properly taken care of the 292 & 312 V8's were excellent engines.
If the owner wants to keep the truck some what stock looking I would suggest the 300 CID engine from the 1970's, lots of power and longevity.
Add a "Clifford 6=8 " four barrel manifold, w/390 CMF carb, headers, a little head work, a good cam and ignition, will result in a truck that will run of and hide from the average small block out fit. A C-4 trans would make the truck very user friendly.
I had an inline six in a half ton pickup, it had Clifford 6=8 equipment, the thing was a rocket ship, the engine put out over 300 hp on a dyno..
The '59-60 F100's generally have Dana 44's or Ford 9" rear ends w/ 372 ratio.
I currently have three '59 F100 4x4's.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 59 Ford 4x4.jpg (33.4 KB, 8 views)
__________________
Bill.... 36 5 win cpe
blucar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2017, 09:17 PM   #16
Tinker
Senior Member
 
Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 7,053
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
I am hitting a wall. I have written emails to Sacramento Vintage Ford, Patriot headers and Clifford. No response. My basic question is "Why does all the parts advertised for the 223 say Fits up to 1956 ?" I am sure there as some radical change in body style in '57, but why does that impact the 223 engine manifold/header wise?
The aftermarket dual castiron header setups for 223 are a rare thing to find.
support for these motors aren't great outside a 2/3 pot intake.

Lot of guys will split the original intake, if you know or are a cast iron welder you can get it done.

I sold a clifford header last yr that i had for about 5yrs.

http://www.shop.cliffordperformance....rd-223_c15.htm
Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2017, 04:20 AM   #17
willowbilly3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Black Hills, SD
Posts: 577
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

I put a 300 with a Comp 260 cam, Offy C, 390 Holley, efi dual exhaust and high energy ignition in a 92 F250 with a ZF. It was great to drive except too much cam for a work truck. But every time I put gas in it I thought wow, I could be driving a 460 and have some real power.
willowbilly3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2017, 01:33 PM   #18
scicala
Senior Member
 
scicala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Detroit suburb, MI
Posts: 3,705
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

Got me confused on the "390 Holley, efi" part.

Sal
scicala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2017, 07:32 AM   #19
bobss396
Senior Member
 
bobss396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 721
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

We have a local shop that did the 223 Ford for the figure-8 racers when the 6 was the spec motor for the class. Some of those were pretty exotic and could run with 8 cylinder cars at other tracks. The chassis of choice was the '62 to '64 Galaxie since it was massively strong.
bobss396 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 05:02 PM   #20
willowbilly3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Black Hills, SD
Posts: 577
Default Re: 59 1/2 ton PU

Quote:
Originally Posted by scicala View Post
Got me confused on the "390 Holley, efi" part.

Sal
The efi engines have dual exhaust manifolds. Read it again, there was a comma and "efi dual exhaust".
willowbilly3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Sponsored Links (Register now to hide all advertisements)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 AM.